Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39093858›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Evaluation of COVID-19 rapid antigen test against polymerase chain reaction test in immunocompromised patients.

Ali Sabateen, Dana Sadaqa, Taleen Nino, Ghayd Zaghal, George Qumsieh, Reena Fakhori, Hammam Rjoub, Tahreer Taha, Rami Zghari, Sari Abu Hanieh and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ali SabateenInfectious Diseases Unit, Augusta Victoria Hospital, East Jerusalem, Palestine.
Dana SadaqaInfectious Diseases Unit, Augusta Victoria Hospital, East Jerusalem, Palestine.ORCID 0000-0003-0317-4818
Taleen NinoMolecular Laboratory, Augusta Victoria Hospital, East Jerusalem, Palestine.
Ghayd ZaghalMolecular Laboratory, Augusta Victoria Hospital, East Jerusalem, Palestine.
George QumsiehMolecular Laboratory, Augusta Victoria Hospital, East Jerusalem, Palestine.
Reena FakhoriMolecular Laboratory, Augusta Victoria Hospital, East Jerusalem, Palestine.
Hammam RjoubInfectious Diseases Unit, Augusta Victoria Hospital, East Jerusalem, Palestine.
Tahreer TahaInfectious Diseases Unit, Augusta Victoria Hospital, East Jerusalem, Palestine.
Rami ZghariInfectious Diseases Unit, Augusta Victoria Hospital, East Jerusalem, Palestine.
Sari Abu HaniehInfectious Diseases Unit, Augusta Victoria Hospital, East Jerusalem, Palestine.
Duaa Al-BashaInfectious Diseases Unit, Augusta Victoria Hospital, East Jerusalem, Palestine.
Marwan QabajaPathology Laboratory, Augusta Victoria Hospital, East Jerusalem, Palestine.
Hamza AlsaidInternal Medicine Department, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel.
Musa Y HindiyehMolecular Laboratory, Augusta Victoria Hospital, East Jerusalem, Palestine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

On the 11th of March 2020, the world faced a new global pandemic, COVID-19 which is a disease caused by the novel coronavirus, it had multiple devastating outcomes on multiple sectors along with significant rates of mortality. These challenges encouraged the development of multiple testing methods, as well as anti-viral medications such as Molnupiravir, as well as evaluating the efficacy of available medications against it, like; Azithromycin, Ritonavir and Hydroxychloroquine. Vaccination against COVID-19 forged into a significant challenge, few months ensuing the first case of SARS-CoV-2, which was diagnosed in December 2019, in Wuhan-China, thus, multiple vaccines were approved for use around the world to combat this pandemic. Our study includes a sample of 556 oncology patients at Augusta Victoria Hospital in Jerusalem, all patients were tested using Panbio rapid antigen test and Allplex PCR Assay. The main objective was to study the sensitivity and specificity of Rapid antigen test, which contributes to a faster isolation call and management of infected patients, thus decreasing the risk on spread to other patients and health care. Patients were categorized based on two factors: Ct range and age group and studying their possible effect on false-negative results. Patients with Ct value less than 20, had the highest detection rate which is consistent with other studies in the literature. The sensitivity and specificity of Panbio Rapid Antigen testing were of 69.9% and 100%, respectively. A correlation between age group and false negative results could not be made, but a correlation between Ct value and false negative result was noticed, Ct value was directly related to false negative results. P-value of 0.007 indicated that results were statistically significant where PCR test is considered more sensitive compared to rapid antigen test.

Indexed as

COVID-19Immunocompromised HostSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and SpecificityAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, ViralCOVID-19 Serological TestingFalse Negative ReactionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolymerase Chain ReactionAntigens, Viral

Identifiers

PMID39093858
PMCPMC11296623

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.