Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39094095›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2024

Co-creating Humanistic AI AgeTech to Support Dynamic Care Ecosystems: A Preliminary Guiding Model.

Amy S Hwang, Thomas Tannou, Jarshini Nanthakumar, Wendy Cao, Charlene H Chu, Ceren Zeytinoglu Atici, Kerseri Scane, Amanda Yu, Winnie Tsang, Jennifer Chan and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Amy S HwangDepartment of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0217-6088
Thomas TannouCentre de Recherche, Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, CIUSSS Centre-Sud de l'Ile de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3476-9822
Jarshini NanthakumarDepartment of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Wendy CaoIndependent Research Consultant, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Charlene H ChuLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0333-7210
Ceren Zeytinoglu AticiBaşlangıç Noktası (Be Node), Turkish Informatics Foundation, Istanbul, Turkey.
Kerseri ScaneIndependent Research Consultant, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Amanda YuIndependent Research Consultant, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Winnie TsangGood Works Collective Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer ChanIndependent Research Consultant, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Paul LeaIndependent Research Consultant, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Zelda HarrisIndependent Research Consultant, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Rosalie H WangDepartment of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

Schwartz Reisman Institute for Technology and Society
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As society rapidly digitizes, successful aging necessitates using technology for health and social care and social engagement. Technologies aimed to support older adults (e.g., smart homes, assistive robots, wheelchairs) are increasingly applying artificial intelligence (AI), and thereby creating ethical challenges to technology development and use. The international debate on AI ethics focuses on implications to society (e.g., bias, equity) and to individuals (e.g., privacy, consent). The relational nature of care, however, warrants a humanistic lens to examine how "AI AgeTech" will shape, and be shaped by, social networks or care ecosystems in terms of their care actors (i.e., older adults, care partners, service providers); inter-actor relations (e.g., care decision making) and relationships (e.g., social, professional); and evolving care arrangements. For instance, if an older adult's reduced functioning leads actors to renegotiate their risk tolerances and care routines, smart homes or robots become more than tools that actors configure; they become semiautonomous actors, in themselves, with the potential to influence functioning and interpersonal relationships. As an experientially diverse, transdisciplinary working group of older adults, care partners, researchers, clinicians, and entrepreneurs, we co-constructed intersectional care experiences, to guide technology research, development, and use. Our synthesis contributes a preliminary guiding model for AI AgeTech innovation that delineates humanistic attributes, values, and design orientations, and captures the ethical, sociological, and technological nuances of dynamic care ecosystems. Our visual probes and recommended tools and techniques offer researchers, developers/innovators, and care actors concrete ways of using this model to promote successful aging in AI-enabled futures.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAgedAgingHumanismHumansRoboticsSelf-Help DevicesCaregivingDigital ageismEthicsRobotSmart home

Identifiers

PMID39094095
PMCPMC11648309

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.