Evidence mapPaperPMID 39095683Full record

ReviewClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2025

Charting cancer's course: revealing the role of diet, exercise, and the microbiome in cancer evolution and immunotherapy response.

Ana Isabel Martin-Quesada, Maeve A Hennessy, Ana Cardeña Gutiérrez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ana Isabel Martin-QuesadaCell Therapy and Early Drug Development Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland. anamartinquesada@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8439-6679
Maeve A HennessyCancer Research @UCC, University College Cork, Dublin, Ireland.
Ana Cardeña GutiérrezHospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Tenerife, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A variety of pathophysiological mechanisms exist by which physical exercise, nutrition, and the microbiome can impact the development of cancer and the response of tumor cells to systemic anti-cancer therapy. Physical exercise positively impacts the different stages of oncological disease and may improve overall survival and quality of life, reduce treatment-associated toxicity, and improve response to immunotherapy. Nutrition impacts quality of life, and novel nutritional regimens and their role in cancer treatment and outcomes are under active investigation. Finally, the microbiome may act as a predictor of response and resistance to immunotherapy. This comprehensive review delves into the interplay between these elements and their impact on oncological outcomes, emphasizing their role in modulating the immune system and enhancing the response to immunotherapy.The data that support the findings of this study are openly available and referenced in the bibliography section.

Indexed as

DietExerciseGastrointestinal MicrobiomeImmunotherapyMicrobiotaNeoplasmsHumansQuality of LifeCancerImmunotherapyMicrobiomeNutritionPhysical exerciseQuality of lifeResponseSarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID39095683
PMCPMC11782318

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.