Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39095719›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2024

Stomatal penetration: the cornerstone of plant resistance to the fungal pathogen Zymoseptoria tritici.

Mélissa Battache, Marta Suarez-Fernandez, Madison Van't Klooster, Florence Cambon, Andrea Sánchez-Vallet, Marc-Henri Lebrun, Thierry Langin, Cyrille Saintenac

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mélissa BattacheUniversité Clermont Auvergne, INRAE, GDEC, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Marta Suarez-FernandezCentro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Technología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, 28223, Spain.
Madison Van't KloosterUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, UR BIOGER, Thiverval-Grignon, France.
Florence CambonUniversité Clermont Auvergne, INRAE, GDEC, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Andrea Sánchez-ValletCentro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Technología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, 28223, Spain.
Marc-Henri LebrunUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, UR BIOGER, Thiverval-Grignon, France.
Thierry LanginUniversité Clermont Auvergne, INRAE, GDEC, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Cyrille SaintenacUniversité Clermont Auvergne, INRAE, GDEC, Clermont-Ferrand, France. cyrille.saintenac@inrae.fr.

Funding

ANR ANR-22-CE20-0034FSE RYC2018-025530-I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeptoria tritici blotch (STB), caused by the foliar fungus Zymoseptoria tritici, is one of the most damaging disease of wheat in Europe. Genetic resistance against this fungus relies on different types of resistance from non-host resistance (NHR) and host species specific resistance (HSSR) to host resistance mediated by quantitative trait loci (QTLs) or major resistance genes (Stb). Characterizing the diversity of theses resistances is of great importance for breeding wheat cultivars with efficient and durable resistance. While the functional mechanisms underlying these resistance types are not well understood, increasing piece of evidence suggest that fungus stomatal penetration and early establishment in the apoplast are both crucial for the outcome of some interactions between Z. tritici and plants. To validate and extend these previous observations, we conducted quantitative comparative phenotypical and cytological analyses of the infection process corresponding to 22 different interactions between plant species and Z. tritici isolates. These interactions included four major bread wheat Stb genes, four bread wheat accessions with contrasting quantitative resistance, two species resistant to Z. tritici isolates from bread wheat (HSSR) and four plant species resistant to all Z. tritici isolates (NHR).

resultsInfiltration of Z. tritici spores into plant leaves allowed the partial bypass of all bread wheat resistances and durum wheat resistance, but not resistances from other plants species. Quantitative comparative cytological analysis showed that in the non-grass plant Nicotiana benthamiana, Z. tritici was stopped before stomatal penetration. By contrast, in all resistant grass plants, Z. tritici was stopped, at least partly, during stomatal penetration. The intensity of this early plant control process varied depending on resistance types, quantitative resistances being the least effective. These analyses also demonstrated that Stb-mediated resistances, HSSR and NHR, but not quantitative resistances, relied on the strong growth inhibition of the few Z. tritici penetrating hyphae at their entry point in the sub-stomatal cavity.

conclusionsIn addition to furnishing a robust quantitative cytological assessment system, our study uncovered three stopping patterns of Z. tritici by plant resistances. Stomatal resistance was found important for most resistances to Z. tritici, independently of its type (Stb, HSSR, NHR). These results provided a basis for the functional analysis of wheat resistance to Z. tritici and its improvement.

Indexed as

AscomycotaDisease ResistancePlant DiseasesPlant StomataTriticumHost-Pathogen InteractionsQuantitative Trait LociFunctional mechanismHost resistancesMesophyll colonizationNon-host resistanceQuantitative cytologyStb genesStomatal penetrationWheatZymoseptoria Tritici

Identifiers

PMID39095719
PMCPMC11295904

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.