Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39097671›Full record

ReviewNPJ precision oncology2024

A comprehensive overview of liquid biopsy applications in pediatric solid tumors.

Ferdinand W Janssen, Nathalie S M Lak, Claudia Y Janda, Lennart A Kester, Michael T Meister, Johannes H M Merks, Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Max M van Noesel, Jozsef Zsiros, Godelieve A M Tytgat and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ precision oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ferdinand W JanssenPrincess Máxima Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3144-3376
Nathalie S M LakPrincess Máxima Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Claudia Y JandaPrincess Máxima Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Lennart A KesterPrincess Máxima Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Michael T MeisterPrincess Máxima Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8311-721X
Johannes H M MerksPrincess Máxima Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7659-1028
Marry M van den Heuvel-EibrinkPrincess Máxima Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7760-879X
Max M van NoeselPrincess Máxima Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Jozsef ZsirosPrincess Máxima Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6716-4347
Godelieve A M TytgatPrincess Máxima Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Leendert H J LooijengaPrincess Máxima Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands. L.H.J.Looijenga-2@prinsesmaximacentrum.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8146-1911

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid biopsies are emerging as an alternative source for pediatric cancer biomarkers with potential applications during all stages of patient care, from diagnosis to long-term follow-up. While developments within this field are reported, these mainly focus on dedicated items such as a specific liquid biopsy matrix, analyte, and/or single tumor type. To the best of our knowledge, a comprehensive overview is lacking. Here, we review the current state of liquid biopsy research for the most common non-central nervous system pediatric solid tumors. These include neuroblastoma, renal tumors, germ cell tumors, osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma and other soft tissue sarcomas, and liver tumors. Within this selection, we discuss the most important or recent studies involving liquid biopsy-based biomarkers, anticipated clinical applications, and the current challenges for success. Furthermore, we provide an overview of liquid biopsy-based biomarker publication output for each tumor type based on a comprehensive literature search between 1989 and 2023. Per study identified, we list the relevant liquid biopsy-based biomarkers, matrices (e.g., peripheral blood, bone marrow, or cerebrospinal fluid), analytes (e.g., circulating cell-free and tumor DNA, microRNAs, and circulating tumor cells), methods (e.g., digital droplet PCR and next-generation sequencing), the involved pediatric patient cohort, and proposed applications. As such, we identified 344 unique publications. Taken together, while the liquid biopsy field in pediatric oncology is still behind adult oncology, potentially relevant publications have increased over the last decade. Importantly, steps towards clinical implementation are rapidly gaining ground, notably through validation of liquid biopsy-based biomarkers in pediatric clinical trials.

Identifiers

PMID39097671
PMCPMC11297996

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.