Evidence mapPaperPMID 39098764Full record

ArticleThe ocular surface2024

Deep-learning based analysis of in-vivo confocal microscopy images of the subbasal corneal nerve plexus' inferior whorl in patients with neuropathic corneal pain and dry eye disease.

Raul E Ruiz-Lozano, Matias Soifer, Zane Z Zemborain, Nadim S Azar, Manuel E Quiroga-Garza, Sofia Murillo, Symon Ma, Seitaro Komai, Anupama Horne, Ali Khodor and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ocular surface, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Raul E Ruiz-LozanoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Foster Center for Ocular Immunology at Duke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Matias SoiferDepartment of Ophthalmology, Foster Center for Ocular Immunology at Duke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Zane Z ZemborainDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Nadim S AzarDepartment of Ophthalmology, Foster Center for Ocular Immunology at Duke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Manuel E Quiroga-GarzaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Foster Center for Ocular Immunology at Duke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Sofia MurilloDepartment of Ophthalmology, Foster Center for Ocular Immunology at Duke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Symon MaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Foster Center for Ocular Immunology at Duke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Seitaro KomaiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Foster Center for Ocular Immunology at Duke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Anupama HorneDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Ali KhodorBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Luis A Rodriguez-GutierrezBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Sandra S StinnettBiostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Sina FarsiuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Victor L PerezDepartment of Ophthalmology, Foster Center for Ocular Immunology at Duke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA. Electronic address: vperez4@med.miami.edu.

Funding

VISION RESEARCHP30EY005722 · DUKE UNIVERSITY · 1985 to 2025
$2.7M
Blink, Lacrimation, and Nociception: Precision Mapping and Integrated Atlas Generation of Corneal Trigeminal AfferentsU01EY034687 · DUKE UNIVERSITY · 2025 to 2025
$1.1M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY005722NEI NIH HHS U01 EY034687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate and compare subbasal corneal nerve parameters of the inferior whorl in patients with dry eye disease (DED), neuropathic corneal pain (NCP), and controls using a novel deep-learning-based algorithm to analyze in-vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) images.

methodsSubbasal nerve plexus (SNP) images of the inferior whorl of patients with DED (n = 49, 77 eyes), NCP (n = 14, 24 eyes), and controls (n = 41, 59 eyes) were taken with IVCM and further analyzed using an open-source artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithm previously developed by our group. This algorithm automatically segments nerves, immune cells, and neuromas in the SNP. The following parameters were compared between groups: nerve area density, average nerve thickness, average nerve segment tortuosity, junction point density, neuroma density, and immune cell density.

results160 eyes of 104 patients (63 % females), aged 56.8 ± 15.4 years, were included. The mean nerve area density was significantly lower in the DED (P = 0.012) and NCP (P < 0.001) groups compared to the control group. The junction point density was lower in the NCP group compared with control (P = 0.001) and DED (P = 0.004) groups. The immune cell density was higher in the DED group compared with controls (P < 0.001).

conclusionsDeep-learning-based analysis of IVCM images of the corneal SNP inferior whorl distinguished a decreased mean nerve area density in patients with DED and NCP compared with controls and an increased immune cell density in patients with oGVHD- and SS-associated DED. These findings suggest that the inferior whorl could be used as landmark to distinguish between patients with DED and NCP.

Indexed as

CorneaDeep LearningDry Eye SyndromesMicroscopy, ConfocalNeuralgiaAdultAgedEye PainFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNerve FibersOphthalmic NerveRetrospective StudiesCorneal nervesdry eye diseaseInferior whorlIn-vivo confocal microscopyNeuropathic corneal painOcular graft-versus-host diseaseSjögren syndromeSubbasal nerve plexus

Identifiers

PMID39098764
PMCPMC11625616

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.