ArticleClinical rheumatology2024
Joint effect of rheumatoid arthritis and diet quality on cardiovascular and mortality outcomes: insights from the Women's Health Initiative.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prevalence and Risk Factors of Cardiovascular Disease in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A Comparative Analysis of Real-World Data.International journal of general medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to examine the combined impact of diet quality and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on development of cardiovascular and mortality outcomes among postmenopausal women.
methodsA total of 99,840 women without baseline RA and 10,494 women with baseline RA were prospectively followed for an average of 12.7 years through the Women's Health Initiative. Diet quality was evaluated using food frequency questionnaires and the Healthy Eating Index 2015. Cardiovascular and mortality outcomes were identified through study follow-up. Four patient groups were used: Reference Group (no RA and healthy diet), Group 1 (no RA and unhealthy diet), Group 2 (RA and healthy diet), Group 3 (RA and unhealthy diet). Data was analyzed using multivariable Cox proportional regression models.
resultsAfter adjustment for confounders, Groups 1 and 3 developed significantly more cardiovascular disease (CVD), coronary heart disease, and incident stroke as compared to the reference. All groups developed more CVD-related mortality and all-cause mortality as compared to the reference. Among patients who already have RA, the incidence of these poorer cardiovascular outcomes does not significantly increase based on diet quality.
conclusionWhile healthy diet quality is associated with reduced adverse cardiovascular and mortality outcomes, RA overpowers the benefits that may be attained through a healthy diet, resulting in the fact that diet quality does not significantly change cardiovascular and mortality outcome incidence in those who already have RA. Conversely, in those who do not have RA, the benefits of a healthy diet are realized with significant reduction of adverse cardiovascular and mortality outcomes as compared to those with an unhealthy diet. Key Points •Healthy diet quality is associated with reduced adverse cardiovascular and mortality outcomes. •RA is associated with increased adverse cardiovascular and mortality outcomes. •While diet quality does not significantly change cardiovascular and mortality outcomes in those who already have RA, those without RA experience significant reduction of these adverse outcomes by adhering to a healthy diet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39098912What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.