ReviewACS omega2024
Novel Biomaterials for Wound Healing and Tissue Regeneration.
Review in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- In Vitro and In Vivo Studies of Skin Wound Healing Potential of Nanochitosan Grafted Curcumin and Lycopene in Wistar Albino Rats.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Nanozymes Toward Diabetic Foot Ulcers.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- The Influence of Blood from Patients with Different Chronic Conditions on the Wettability of Dental Implant Surfaces.Acta stomatologica Croatica · 2025Article
- A Scoping Review of Recent Developments in Cellulose-Derived Hydrogels for Dental Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Bioengineered microneedles and nanomedicine as therapeutic platform for tissue regeneration.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Nanomanaging Chronic Wounds with Targeted Exosome Therapeutics.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Exosomes from Different Sources in Promoting Wound Healing.Recent advances in drug delivery and formulation · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin is the first defense barrier of the human body, which can resist the invasion of external dust, microorganisms and other pollutants, and ensure that the human body maintains the homeostasis of the internal environment. Once the skin is damaged, the health threat to the human body will increase. Wound repair and the human internal environment are a dynamic process. How to effectively accelerate the healing of wounds without affecting the internal environment of the human body and guarantee that the repaired tissue retains its original function as much as possible has become a research hotspot. With the advancement of technology, researchers have combined new technologies to develop and prepare various types of materials for wound healing. This article will introduce the wound repair materials developed and prepared in recent years from three types: nanofibers, composite hydrogels, and other new materials. The paper aims to provide reference for researchers in related fields to develop and prepare multifunctional materials. This may be helpful to design more ideal materials for clinical application, and then achieve better wound healing and regeneration effects.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.