Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39100428›Full record

Trial reportPatient preference and adherence2024

Video Education and Behavior Contract to Improve Outcomes After Renal Transplantation (VECTOR): A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Holly Mansell, Nicola Rosaasen, Jenny Wichart, Patricia West-Thielke, David Blackburn, Juxin Liu, Rahul Mainra, Ahmed Shoker, Brianna Groot, Kevin Wen and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readCase ReportsClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Patient preference and adherence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03540121 (Improving Adherence in Kidney Recipients), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03540121 nacompletednot on this map

Improving Adherence in Kidney Recipients: a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Post-transplant Education Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of SaskatchewanRan2018 to 2022Enrolled173ConditionsKidney Transplantation, Medication AdherenceArmsVideo education + adherence contract
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Holly MansellCollege of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6405-4775
Nicola RosaasenSaskatchewan Transplant Program, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Jenny WichartDepartment of Pharmacy, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9477-5776
Patricia West-ThielkeUniversity of Illinois Health Sciences System, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8288-5732
David BlackburnCollege of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7831-5913
Juxin LiuDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Arts and Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Rahul MainraSaskatchewan Transplant Program; Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Ahmed ShokerSaskatchewan Transplant Program; Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Brianna GrootCanadian Hub for Applied and Social Research, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6562-9892
Kevin WenDivision of Nephrology and Transplant Immunology, Department of Medicine University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Anita WongDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Bita BateniSt. Paul's Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Cindy LuoVancouver General Hospital; Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Paraag TrivediTransplant Recipient/Patient Advisor, Regina, SK, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sub-optimal adherence to immunosuppressant medications reduces graft survival for kidney transplant recipients and adherence-enhancing interventions are resource and time intensive. We performed a multi-center randomized controlled trial to investigate the impact of an electronically delivered intervention on adherence. Of 203 adult kidney transplant recipients who received a de novo kidney transplant n = 173 agreed to participate (intent-to-treat population) and were randomized to the intervention (video education plus behavior contract n = 91) or the control (standard education, n = 82). No significant differences were found between the groups for medication adherence measured by the Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medications Scale, intrapatient variability in tacrolimus levels, time in therapeutic range for any immunosuppressant, knowledge, self-efficacy, QOL, or hospitalizations. Among a subgroup of 64 participants randomized to the intervention group who completed a post-intervention questionnaire, two-thirds (67%, n = 43) reported watching at least 80% of the videos and 58% (n = 37) completed the electronic goal setting exercise and adherence contract. An autonomous goal setting exercise and electronic behavioural contract added to standard of care did not improve any outcomes. Our findings reiterate that nonadherence in transplantation is a difficult multifactorial problem that simple solutions will not solve. Trial registration number NCT03540121.

Indexed as

immunosuppressionkidney transplantmedication adherencesolid organ transplant

Identifiers

PMID39100428
PMCPMC11298174

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.