ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2024
Association between dietary intake of niacin and stroke in the US residents: evidence from national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES) 1999-2018.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dietary Riboflavin Intake and the Risk of Stroke: Insights From NHANES 2007-2018.Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
- The relationship between dietary vitamin B1 and stroke: a machine learning analysis of NHANES data.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Niacin intake and mortality (total and cardiovascular disease) in patients with cardiovascular disease: Insights from NHANES 2003-2018.Nutrition journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to explore the association between niacin intake and stroke within a diverse, multi-ethnic population. Methods: A stringent set of inclusion and exclusion criteria led to the enrollment of 39,721 participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Two interviews were conducted to recall dietary intake, and the USDA's Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies (FNDDS) was utilized to calculate niacin intake based on dietary recall results. Weighted multivariate logistic regression was employed to examine the correlation between niacin and stroke, with a simultaneous exploration of potential nonlinear relationships using restricted cubic spline (RCS) regression. Results: A comprehensive analysis of baseline data revealed that patients with stroke history had lower niacin intake levels. Both RCS analysis and multivariate logistic regression indicated a negative nonlinear association between niacin intake and stroke. The dose-response relationship exhibited a non-linear pattern within the range of dietary niacin intake. Prior to the inflection point (21.8 mg) in the non-linear correlation between niacin intake and stroke risk, there exists a marked decline in the risk of stroke as niacin intake increases. Following the inflection point, the deceleration in the decreasing trend of stroke risk with increasing niacin intake becomes evident. The inflection points exhibit variations across diverse populations. Conclusion: This investigation establishes a negative nonlinear association between niacin intake and stroke in the broader American population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.