Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39101951›Full record

ArticleMedical microbiology and immunology2024

Analytical and clinical evaluation of a novel real-time PCR-based detection kit for Mpox virus.

Till Bunse, Anne Ziel, Philipp Hagen, George Rigopoulos, Umit Yasar, Hakan Inan, Gurbet Köse, Ulrich Eigner, Rolf Kaiser, Nils Bardeck and 7 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical microbiology and immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Diagnostic accuracy of polymerase chain reaction for detection of mpox in humans.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Till BunseSchool of Medicine and Health, Institute of Virology, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Anne ZielRequalite GmbH, 82166, Graefelfing, Germany.
Philipp HagenInstitute of Virology, Helmholtz Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany.
George RigopoulosSchool of Medicine and Health, Institute of Virology, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Umit YasarRequalite GmbH, 82166, Graefelfing, Germany.
Hakan InanRequalite GmbH, 82166, Graefelfing, Germany.
Gurbet KöseRequalite GmbH, 82166, Graefelfing, Germany.
Ulrich EignerMVZ Labor Dr. Limbach, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany.
Rolf KaiserInstitute of Virology, University of Cologne, 50935, Cologne, Germany.
Nils BardeckInstitute of Virology, University of Cologne, 50935, Cologne, Germany.
Jasmin KöfferMVZ Labor Dr. Limbach, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany.
Melissa KolbMVZ Labor Dr. Limbach, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany.
Xiaomei RenNational Genetic Detection Technology Application Demonstration Center, Sansure Biotech Inc, Changsha, 410205, People's Republic of China.
Deyong TanNational Genetic Detection Technology Application Demonstration Center, Sansure Biotech Inc, Changsha, 410205, People's Republic of China.
Lizhong DaiNational Genetic Detection Technology Application Demonstration Center, Sansure Biotech Inc, Changsha, 410205, People's Republic of China.
Ulrike ProtzerSchool of Medicine and Health, Institute of Virology, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Jochen M WettengelSchool of Medicine and Health, Institute of Virology, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany. Wettengel@tum.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Outbreaks of emerging diseases, like Mpox in 2022, pose unprecedented challenges to global healthcare systems. Although Mpox cases globally decreased since the end of 2022, numbers are still significant in the African Region, European Region, Region of the Americas, and Western Pacific Region. Rapid and efficient detection of infected individuals by precise screening assays is crucial for successful containment. In these assays, analytical and clinical performance must be assessed to ensure high quality. However, clinical studies evaluating Mpox virus (MPXV) detection kits using patient-derived samples are scarce. This study evaluated the analytical and clinical performance of a new diagnostic MPXV real-time PCR detection kit (Sansure Monkeypox Virus Nucleic Acid Diagnostic Kit) using patient-derived samples collected in Germany during the MPXV clade IIb outbreak in 2022. Our experimental approach determined the Limit of Detection (LoD) to less than 200 cp/mL using whole blood samples and samples derived from vesicles or pustules. Furthermore, we tested potentially inhibiting substances and pathogens with homologous nucleic acid sequences or similar clinical presentation and detected no cross-reactivity or interference. Following this, the assay was compared to a CE-marked test in a clinical performance study and achieved a diagnostic sensitivity of 100.00% and diagnostic specificity of 96.97%. In summary, the investigated real-time PCR assay demonstrates high analytical performance and concurs with the competitor device with high specificity and sensitivity.

Indexed as

Real-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityDisease OutbreaksGermanyHumansLimit of DetectionMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMpox, MonkeypoxParapoxvirusReagent Kits, DiagnosticReagent Kits, DiagnosticClinical diagnosticsMpoxMpox detection assayMPXV

Identifiers

PMID39101951
PMCPMC11300543

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.