ArticleMedical microbiology and immunology2024
Analytical and clinical evaluation of a novel real-time PCR-based detection kit for Mpox virus.
Article in Medical microbiology and immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of diagnostic performance between the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention real-time PCR assays for molecular detection of the mpox virus.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Evaluation and comparison of three qPCR commercial assays and three automated platforms for the detection of monkeypox virus DNA.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- The emergence of Clade IIb and Ib mpox viruses: a state-of-the-art review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Serological differentiation between Mpox infection and vaccine-induced immunity: a mini-review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- A point-of-care testing device for monkeypox virus integrating recombinase polymerase amplification and lateral flow assay.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- LAMPOX: A Portable and Rapid Molecular Diagnostic Assay for the Epidemic Clade IIb Mpox Virus Detection.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of 3 Mpox Lateral Flow Assays for Antigen Detection, Democratic Republic of the Congo and United Kingdom.Emerging infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Clinical implement of Probe-Capture Metagenomics in sepsis patients: A multicentre and prospective study.Clinical and translational medicine · 2025Article
- The resurgence of monkeypox: Epidemiology, clinical features, and public health implications in the post-smallpox eradication era.New microbes and new infections · 2024Review
- Diagnostic accuracy of polymerase chain reaction for detection of mpox in humans.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Outbreaks of emerging diseases, like Mpox in 2022, pose unprecedented challenges to global healthcare systems. Although Mpox cases globally decreased since the end of 2022, numbers are still significant in the African Region, European Region, Region of the Americas, and Western Pacific Region. Rapid and efficient detection of infected individuals by precise screening assays is crucial for successful containment. In these assays, analytical and clinical performance must be assessed to ensure high quality. However, clinical studies evaluating Mpox virus (MPXV) detection kits using patient-derived samples are scarce. This study evaluated the analytical and clinical performance of a new diagnostic MPXV real-time PCR detection kit (Sansure Monkeypox Virus Nucleic Acid Diagnostic Kit) using patient-derived samples collected in Germany during the MPXV clade IIb outbreak in 2022. Our experimental approach determined the Limit of Detection (LoD) to less than 200 cp/mL using whole blood samples and samples derived from vesicles or pustules. Furthermore, we tested potentially inhibiting substances and pathogens with homologous nucleic acid sequences or similar clinical presentation and detected no cross-reactivity or interference. Following this, the assay was compared to a CE-marked test in a clinical performance study and achieved a diagnostic sensitivity of 100.00% and diagnostic specificity of 96.97%. In summary, the investigated real-time PCR assay demonstrates high analytical performance and concurs with the competitor device with high specificity and sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.