Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39102822›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular research2024

Calciprotein particle counts associate with vascular remodelling in chronic kidney disease.

Lian Feenstra, Melanie Reijrink, Andreas Pasch, Edward R Smith, Lotte M Visser, Marian Bulthuis, Monique E Lodewijk, Mirjam F Mastik, Marcel J W Greuter, Riemer H J A Slart and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. The formation and function of calciprotein particles.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Lian FeenstraDepartment of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1297-5887
Melanie ReijrinkDepartment of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9447-7333
Andreas PaschCalciscon AG, Biel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7439-0748
Edward R SmithDepartment of Nephrology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Lotte M VisserDepartment of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Marian BulthuisDepartment of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Monique E LodewijkDepartment of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Mirjam F MastikDepartment of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Marcel J W GreuterDepartment of Radiology, Medical Imaging Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5721-9159
Riemer H J A SlartDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Medical Imaging Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5565-1164
Douwe J MulderDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Vascular Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3715-6474
Robert A PolDepartment of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2236-5233
Charlotte A Te Velde-KeyzerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8197-8056
Guido KrenningDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Division Experimental Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5850-5667
Jan-Luuk HillebrandsDepartment of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3135-3274
TransplantLines Investigators

Funding

Astellas Pharma EuropeDe Cock-Hadders Scientific Research FoundationDutch Kidney Foundation 16TKI02Graduated School of Medical Sciences of the University of GroningenHealth Holland LSHM17034-HSGFJohn Perrett BequestViertel Charitable Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsCalciprotein particles (CPPs) are circulating calcium and phosphate nanoparticles associated with the development of vascular calcification (VC) in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Although recent studies have been focusing on associations of CPPs with the presence of VC in CKD, insights in the underlying processes and mechanisms by which CPPs might aggravate VC and vascular dysfunction in vivo are currently lacking. Here, we assessed the overall burden of abdominal VC in healthy kidney donors and CKD patients and subsequently performed transcriptome profiling in the vascular tissue obtained from these subjects, linking outcome to CPP counts and calcification propensity. METHODS AND

resultsCalcification scores were quantified in renal arteries, iliac arteries, and abdominal aorta using computed tomography (CT) scans of kidney donors and CKD patients. The vascular tissue was collected from kidney donors (renal artery) and CKD patients (iliac artery), after which bulk RNA sequencing and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) were performed on a subset of patients. Calcification propensity (crystallization time, T50) was measured using nephelometry and CPP counts with microparticle flow cytometric analysis. Increased calcification scores (based on CT) were found in CKD patients compared to kidney donors. Transcriptome profiling revealed enrichment for processes related to endothelial activation, inflammation, extracellular matrix (ECM) remodelling, and ossification in CKD vascular biopsies compared to kidney donors. Calcification propensity was increased in CKD, as well as CPP counts, with the latter being significantly associated with markers of vascular remodelling.

conclusionOur findings reveal that CKD is characterized by systemic VC with increased calcification propensity and CPP counts. Transcriptome profiling showed altered vascular gene expression with enrichment for endothelial activation, inflammation, ECM remodelling, and ossification. Moreover, we demonstrate, for the first time, that vascular remodelling processes are associated with increased circulating CPP counts. Interventions targeting CPPs are promising avenues for alleviating vascular remodelling and VC in CKD.

Indexed as

Aorta, AbdominalRenal Insufficiency, ChronicVascular CalcificationVascular RemodelingAdultAgedBiomarkersCalcifying NanoparticlesCase-Control StudiesFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansIliac ArteryMaleMiddle AgedPhosphatesBiomarkersCalcifying NanoparticlesPhosphatesCalcification propensity (crystallization time, T50)Calciprotein particles (CPPs)Chronic kidney disease (CKD)Endothelial activationVascular calcificationVascular remodelling

Identifiers

PMID39102822
PMCPMC11629976

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.