ArticleScientific reports2024
Meta graphical lasso: uncovering hidden interactions among latent mechanisms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Organ Crosstalk in HFpEF: Reframing a Cardiac Syndrome as a widespread Systemic Disease.Journal of precision medicine (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Explaining hidden mechanisms: a generative model for causal graphs with nonlinear latent factors.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In complex systems, it's crucial to uncover latent mechanisms and their context-dependent relationships. This is especially true in medical research, where identifying unknown cancer mechanisms and their impact on phenomena like drug resistance is vital. Directly observing these mechanisms is challenging due to measurement complexities, leading to an approach that infers latent mechanisms from observed variable distributions. Despite machine learning advancements enabling sophisticated generative models, their black-box nature complicates the interpretation of complex latent mechanisms. A promising method for understanding these mechanisms involves estimating latent factors through linear projection, though there's no assurance that inferences made under specific conditions will remain valid across contexts. We propose a novel solution, suggesting data, even from systems appearing complex, can often be explained by sparse dependencies among a few common latent factors, regardless of the situation. This simplification allows for modeling that yields significant insights across diverse fields. We demonstrate this with datasets from finance, where we capture societal trends from stock price movements, and medicine, where we uncover new insights into cancer drug resistance through gene expression analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.