ArticleiScience2024
A cross-cohort analysis of dental plaque microbiome in early childhood caries.
Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early Childhood Caries in Preschool Children: A Multidimensional Analysis From Biological Mechanisms to Socioecological Interventions.Oral diseases · 2026Review
- Multicohort external validation ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Recent advances in therapeutic probiotics: insights from human trials.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- Global, regional, and National levels and trends in burden of dental caries and periodontal disease from 1990 to 2035: result from the global burden of disease study 2021.BMC oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early childhood caries (ECC) is a multifactorial disease with a microbiome playing a significant role in caries progression. Understanding changes at the microbiome level in ECC is required to develop diagnostic and preventive strategies. In our study, we combined data from small independent cohorts to compare microbiome composition using a unified pipeline and applied a batch correction to avoid the pitfalls of batch effects. Our meta-analysis identified common biomarker species between different studies. We identified the best machine learning method for the classification of ECC versus caries-free samples and compared the performance of this method using a leave-one-dataset-out approach. Our random forest model was found to be generalizable when used in combination with other studies. While our results highlight the potential microbial species involved in ECC and disease classification, we also mentioned the limitations that can serve as a guide for future researchers to design and use appropriate tools for such analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.