ArticleClinical kidney journal2024
Prospective study of the effect of rituximab on kidney function in membranous nephropathy.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proteinuria selectivity index as a predictor of remission and rituximab efficacy in primary membranous nephropathy: a single-center retrospective analysis.Renal failure · 2026Article
- Long-term real-world outcomes of rituximab in primary membranous nephropathy: a 154-patient cohort study from China.Renal failure · 2026Article
- Canadian Society of Nephrology Commentary on the Evolving Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes Adult Glomerulonephritis Guidelines.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2026Article
- Impact of Time-To-Treatment on Outcomes in Autoimmune Membranous Nephropathy.Kidney international reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with membranous nephropathy (MN) and poor kidney function or active disease despite previous immunosuppression are underrepresented in clinical trials. It is unknown how effective rituximab is in this population. Methods: This prospective, multi-centre, single-arm, real-world study of patients with active MN [urine protein-creatinine ratio (uPCR) >350 mg/mmol and serum albumin <30 g/L, or a fall in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of at least 20% or more over at least 3 months] evaluated rituximab in those with contraindications to calcineurin inhibitors and cytotoxic therapy. The primary outcome was change in rate of eGFR decline before and after rituximab. Complete or partial remission were defined as uPCR <30 mg/mmol or uPCR <350 mg/mmol with a ≥50% fall from baseline, respectively. Results: A total of 180 patients [median age 59 years, interquartile range (IQR) 48-68] received rituximab and were followed up for a median duration of 17 months. Seventy-seven percent had prior immunosuppression. Median eGFR and uPCR at baseline were 49.2 mL/min/1.73 m Conclusion: Rituximab significantly reduced the rate of eGFR decline in active MN including those who had received prior immunosuppression or with poor baseline kidney function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.