Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39106093›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical education2024

The Use of a Novel Virtual Reality Training Tool for Peritoneal Dialysis: Qualitative Assessment Among Health Care Professionals.

Caterina Lonati, Marie Wellhausen, Stefan Pennig, Thomas Röhrßen, Fatih Kircelli, Svenja Arendt, Ulrich Tschulena

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Caterina Lonati *Center for Preclinical Research, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7855-7851
Marie Wellhausen *Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-8363-8865
Stefan Pennigcontext, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-5547-0781
Thomas Röhrßencontext, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0004-7050-8755
Fatih KircelliFresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2635-6737
Svenja ArendtFresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4643-8131
Ulrich TschulenaFresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5726-008X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective peritoneal dialysis (PD) training is essential for performing dialysis at home and reducing the risk of peritonitis and other PD-related infections. Virtual reality (VR) is an innovative learning tool that is able to combine theoretical information, interactivity, and behavioral instructions while offering a playful learning environment. To improve patient training for PD, Fresenius Medical Care launched the stay•safe MyTraining VR, a novel educational program based on the use of a VR headset and a handheld controller.

objectiveThis qualitative assessment aims to investigate opinions toward the new tool among the health care professionals (HCPs) who were responsible for implementing the VR application.

methodsWe recruited nursing staff and nephrologists who have gained practical experience with the stay•safe MyTraining VR within pilot dialysis centers. Predetermined open-ended questions were administered during individual and group video interviews.

resultsWe interviewed 7 HCPs who have 2 to 20 years of experience in PD training. The number of patients trained with the stay•safe MyTraining VR ranged from 2 to 5 for each professional. The stay•safe MyTraining VR was well accepted and perceived as a valuable supplementary tool for PD training. From the respondents' perspective, the technology improved patients' learning experience by facilitating the internalization of both medical information and procedural skills. HCPs highlighted that the opportunity offered by VR to reiterate training activities in a positive and safe learning environment, according to each patient's needs, can facilitate error correction and implement a standardized training curriculum. However, VR had limited use in the final phase of the patient PD training program, where learners need to get familiar with the handling of the materials. Moreover, the traditional PD training was still considered essential to manage the emotional and motivational aspects and address any patient-specific application-oriented questions. In addition to its use within PD training, VR was perceived as a useful tool to support the decision-making process of patients and train other HCPs. Moreover, VR introduction was associated with increased efficiency and productivity of HCPs because it enabled them to perform other activities while the patient was practicing with the device. As for patients' acceptance of the new tool, interviewees reported positive feedback, including that of older adults. Limited use with patients experiencing dementia or severe visual impairment or lacking sensomotoric competence was mentioned.

conclusionsThe stay•safe MyTraining VR is suggested to improve training efficiency and efficacy and thus could have a positive impact in the PD training scenario. Our study offers a process proposal that can serve as a guide to the implementation of a VR-based PD training program within other dialysis centers. Dedicated research is needed to assess the operational benefits and the consequences on patient management.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelPeritoneal DialysisQualitative ResearchVirtual RealityAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as Topicchronic kidney diseasenursingpatient educationpatient trainingperitoneal dialysisqualitative assessmentvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID39106093
PMCPMC11336508

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.