Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39106178›Full record

SynthesisActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2024

Does HPV vaccination during periconceptional or gestational period increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes?-An updated systematic review and meta-analysis based on timing of vaccination.

Jiawei Zhang, Zhirun Lian, Xiaoou Xue, Jun Li, Yuying Zhu, Nian Huang, Wei Xie

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jiawei ZhangBeijing University of Chinese Medicine Affiliated Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhirun LianBeijing University of Chinese Medicine Affiliated Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiaoou XueBeijing University of Chinese Medicine Affiliated Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jun LiBeijing University of Chinese Medicine Affiliated Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yuying ZhuBeijing University of Chinese Medicine Affiliated Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing, China.
Nian HuangBeijing University of Chinese Medicine Affiliated Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wei XieBeijing University of Chinese Medicine Affiliated Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0000-7658-4258

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81774360
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine is crucial in preventing cervical cancer, and a significant number of women in 135 countries worldwide may have unknowingly received the vaccine during peri-pregnancy or pregnancy due to a lack of regular pregnancy testing. Previous studies on the safety of pregnancy outcomes with vaccination before and after pregnancy have not reached definitive conclusions. Thus, we subdivided the vaccination time frame and conducted an updated study to further examine whether exposure to the HPV vaccine during pregnancy or the periconceptional period increases the likelihood of adverse pregnancy outcomes. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe clinical trials and cohort studies published before August 1, 2023, were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool were adopted to evaluate the risk of bias in the included studies. In addition, the quality assessment was carried out using the Review Manager 5.4 Software, and a meta-analysis was conducted using the Stata 16 Software.

resultsEleven studies were located. The results showed that receiving 4vHPV during the periconceptional or gestational period had no relationship with an increased risk of spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, preterm birth, birth defects, small for gestational age, and ectopic pregnancy. Neither receiving 2vHPV nor 9vHPV was associated with a higher risk of stillbirth, preterm birth, birth defects, small for gestational age, and ectopic pregnancy; however, receiving 2vHPV during the period from 45 days before last menstrual period (LMP) to LMP and 9vHPV during the period from 90 days before LMP to 45 days after LMP seemed to be related to an increased risk of spontaneous abortion (RR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.04-2.45, RR = 2.04, 95% CI: 1.28-3.24).

conclusionsIn conclusion, the likelihood of an elevated risk of spontaneous abortion caused by HPV vaccination during the periconceptional or gestational period could not be completely ruled out. Given the lack of evidence, further research is needed to examine the effect of HPV vaccination on spontaneous abortion.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesPregnancy OutcomeFemaleHumansPregnancyUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaccinationPapillomavirus Vaccineshuman papillomavirus vaccinemeta‐analysispregnancy outcomesystematic reviewvaccine safety

Identifiers

PMID39106178
PMCPMC11426224

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.