Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39107294›Full record

SynthesisTranslational psychiatry2024

Pharmacogenomic scores in psychiatry: systematic review of current evidence.

Nigussie T Sharew, Scott R Clark, K Oliver Schubert, Azmeraw T Amare

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Translational psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Moving toward precision and personalized treatment strategies in psychiatry.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Review
  11. Pharmaco-Multiomics: A New Frontier in Precision Psychiatry.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nigussie T SharewDiscipline of Psychiatry, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6443-6992
Scott R ClarkDiscipline of Psychiatry, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1640-5611
K Oliver SchubertDiscipline of Psychiatry, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1690-0209
Azmeraw T AmareDiscipline of Psychiatry, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia. azmeraw.amare@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-7940-0335

Funding

Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) APP2008000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past two decades, significant progress has been made in the development of polygenic scores (PGSs). One specific application of PGSs is the development and potential use of pharmacogenomic- scores (PGx-scores) to identify patients who can benefit from a specific medication or are likely to experience side effects. This systematic review comprehensively evaluates published PGx-score studies in psychiatry and provides insights into their potential clinical use and avenues for future development. A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases until 22 August 2023. This review included fifty-three primary studies, of which the majority (69.8%) were conducted using samples of European ancestry. We found that over 90% of PGx-scores in psychiatry have been developed based on psychiatric and medical diagnoses or trait variants, rather than pharmacogenomic variants. Among these PGx-scores, the polygenic score for schizophrenia (PGS

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMultifactorial InheritancePharmacogeneticsHumansPsychiatrySchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID39107294
PMCPMC11303815

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.