ReviewOncology reviews2024
DNA Methylation Biomarkers in Stool Samples: Enhancing Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies.
Review in Oncology reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Fecal DNA SDC2 methylation test for colorectal cancer diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2026Pooled it
- Combination of fecal SDC2 methylation with serum CEA/CA72-4 in screening of colorectal cancer and precancerous lesions.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- Screening, Prognostic, and Predictive Molecular Tools for Colorectal Cancer: Recent Advances in the Classical Background.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis: unraveling mechanisms and advancing surveillance and chemoprevention.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Stool shed cell transcriptomics mirrors tumor biology and enables colorectal cancer diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Review
- The diagnostic value of serum Ephrin-A1 in patients with colorectal cancer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Minimally Invasive and Emerging Diagnostic Approaches in Endometrial Cancer: Epigenetic Insights and the Promise of DNA Methylation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant global health challenge, ranking among the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Despite efforts in prevention and early detection, CRC incidence and mortality rates are expected to rise substantially. Traditional screening methods like gFOBT, FIT, flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, CTC, and colon capsule have limitations, including false positives/negatives, limited scope, or invasiveness. Recent developments in CRC screening involve DNA methylation biomarkers, showing promise in detecting early-stage CRC and precancerous lesions. Stool-based DNA testing is emerging as a noninvasive and convenient method for detecting CRC-associated DNA methylation alterations, offering potential for earlier detection compared to traditional methods. Several commercial stool-based DNA methylation tests targeting different genes associated with CRC have demonstrated varying sensitivity and specificity, some surpassing traditional screening methods. Challenges remain in optimizing their performance and accessibility. This review discusses how DNA methylation biomarkers could enhance CRC screening, and stool-based DNA methylation tests could revolutionize CRC screening practices, comparing them to the gold standard.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.