SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2024
Efficacy and safety of the traditional Chinese formula Shengjiang powder combined with conventional therapy in the treatment of diabetic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Chinese herbal foot baths as a new strategy for diabetic foot with Wagner grade of 0 or 1: a meta-analysis and data mining.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Gut microbiota-liver-kidney axis in diabetic kidney disease: mechanistic insights into amino acid metabolism and nutritional intervention strategies targeting natural bioactive compounds.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Qi-Gui-Sheng-Jiang-San Decoction Regulating Hypoxia Response Through Non-Oxygen-Dependent Pathway Improves Diabetic Kidney Disease: Coupling Network Pharmacology With Experimental Verification.Journal of diabetes research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of Shengjiang powder as a treatment for DKD. Methods: A comprehensive search was performed in eight databases from their inception to December 30, 2023, to identify relevant RCTs. The inclusion criteria were diagnosis of DKD and intervention including TCM that contained Shengjiang powder. Two researchers independently conducted literature screening and data extraction, utilizing the Rob2 tool and GRADE to assess the quality of the RCTs. Meta-analysis was carried out using RevMan 5.4.1 and Stata 15.0. Results: As a result of the search, 23 RCTs comprising 1,682 patients. The interventions resulted in significant reductions in all the assessed indicators: 24-h urinary protein, UAER, mALB, BUN, Scr, FBG, 2hPG, HbA1c, total cholesterol, and Triglycerides. Together the results showed that Shengjiang powder, in conjunction with conventional therapy, is an effective treatment of DKD. Subgroup analyses, considering duration, stage, blood glucose control levels, baseline blood glucose levels, and baseline Scr levels indicated that shorter duration treatment had a greater effect on UAER, 2hPG, and HbA1c. Additionally, Shengjiang powder was more effective in reducing 24-h urinary protein, Scr, and 2hPG in stage IV patients compared to corresponding values at other stages. However, with respect to FBG, the treatment was more effective in stage II/III. Shengjiang powder also, reduced Scr levels significantly in patients with higher baseline Scr and reduced urinary protein excretion with stricter blood glucose control. The interventions had additional lipid-regulating effects in cases with looser blood glucose control and led to a remarkable reduction in BUN and Scr levels in patients with FBG > 11.1 mmol/L. Conclusion: Shengjiang powder may supplement conventional therapy, thus benefiting DKD patients in terms of reducing urinary protein, stabilizing kidney function, and improving blood glucose and lipid metabolism. Considering the significant heterogeneity among studies and limited quality of some reports, our conclusions need to be further verified through analyses utilizing larger, multi-center samples of higher quality. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024490795.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.