Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39110360›Full record

ArticleJournal of community health2024

Investigate-Design-Practice-Reflect: An Iterative Community-Engaged Action Process to Improve Population Health.

Marisa S Rosen, Ann E Rogers, Mary J Von Seggern, Brandon L Grimm, Athena K Ramos, Michaela A Schenkelberg, Regina E Idoate, David A Dzewaltowski

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marisa S RosenCollege of Public Health, Department of Health Promotion, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA. marisa.rosen@unmc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9606-4812
Ann E RogersCollege of Public Health, Department of Health Promotion, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5494-3093
Mary J Von SeggernCollege of Public Health, Department of Health Promotion, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3895-1584
Brandon L GrimmCollege of Public Health, Department of Health Promotion, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8920-7870
Athena K RamosCollege of Public Health, Department of Health Promotion, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5194-8243
Michaela A SchenkelbergCollege of Education, Health, and Human Sciences, School of Health and Kinesiology, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0354-8122
Regina E IdoateCollege of Public Health, Department of Health Promotion, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5782-4455
David A DzewaltowskiCollege of Public Health, Department of Health Promotion, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6592-1041

Funding

Whole-of-Community Systems Intervention for Youth Population Physical ActivityR01CA215420 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI DZEWALTOWSKI, DAVID A · 2018 to 2022
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA215420NCI NIH HHS R01CA215420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity-based coalitions are a common strategy for community engagement efforts targeting the improvement of a variety of population health outcomes. The typical processes that coalitions follow to organize efforts include steps that are sequential, slow, and time intensive. These processes also limit local decision-making to the selection of evidence-based policies or programs.

methodsWe present a process control theory-based Community Action Process, Investigate-Design-Practice-Reflect (IDPR), where community hubs (i.e., coalitions) organize agile efforts in a non-sequential, rapid, and efficient manner to harness local assets and data to make decisions regarding the provision and production of population health services. Using qualitative methods, we illustrate and analyze the use of IDPR in a one community case study as part of Wellscapes, a Type 3-hybrid implementation-effectiveness community randomized controlled trial to improve children's population health physical activity.

resultsWe found community members followed the IDPR Community Action Process to rapidly design, organize, deliver, and receive feedback on a community-based, children's population physical activity prototype, an afterschool Play-in-the-Park opportunity for all children. DISCUSSION: Following IDPR afforded the community coalition timely learning through feedback within a process that coordinated decisions regarding what community services met community needs (provision decisions) and how to organize the production of the population health services (production decisions).

Indexed as

Population HealthChildCommunity ParticipationExerciseHealth PromotionHumansCoalitionsCommunity ActionCommunity EngagementCross-sector CollaborationQuality Improvement

Identifiers

PMID39110360
PMCPMC11413050

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.