Evidence mapPaperPMID 39110501Full record

ArticleOnline journal of public health informatics2024

Predictive Data Analytics in Telecare and Telehealth: Systematic Scoping Review.

Euan Anderson, Marilyn Lennon, Kimberley Kavanagh, Natalie Weir, David Kernaghan, Marc Roper, Emma Dunlop, Linda Lapp

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Online journal of public health informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Euan AndersonDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5040-7589
Marilyn LennonDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3271-2400
Kimberley KavanaghDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2679-5409
Natalie WeirStrathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1422-9415
David KernaghanStrathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0798-4885
Marc RoperDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6794-4637
Emma DunlopStrathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0719-7614
Linda LappCentre for Heart Lung Innovation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3743-434X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelecare and telehealth are important care-at-home services used to support individuals to live more independently at home. Historically, these technologies have reactively responded to issues. However, there has been a recent drive to make better use of the data from these services to facilitate more proactive and predictive care.

objectiveThis review seeks to explore the ways in which predictive data analytics techniques have been applied in telecare and telehealth in at-home settings.

methodsThe PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist was adhered to alongside Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework. English language papers published in MEDLINE, Embase, and Social Science Premium Collection between 2012 and 2022 were considered and results were screened against inclusion or exclusion criteria.

resultsIn total, 86 papers were included in this review. The types of analytics featuring in this review can be categorized as anomaly detection (n=21), diagnosis (n=32), prediction (n=22), and activity recognition (n=11). The most common health conditions represented were Parkinson disease (n=12) and cardiovascular conditions (n=11). The main findings include: a lack of use of routinely collected data; a dominance of diagnostic tools; and barriers and opportunities that exist, such as including patient-reported outcomes, for future predictive analytics in telecare and telehealth.

conclusionsAll papers in this review were small-scale pilots and, as such, future research should seek to apply these predictive techniques into larger trials. Additionally, further integration of routinely collected care data and patient-reported outcomes into predictive models in telecare and telehealth offer significant opportunities to improve the analytics being performed and should be explored further. Data sets used must be of suitable size and diversity, ensuring that models are generalizable to a wider population and can be appropriately trained, validated, and tested.

Indexed as

data analyticshomepredictpredictionpredictionspredictivepredictive modelsreview methodologyreview methodsscopingscoping reviewsearchsearchessearchingsynthesistelecaretelehealthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID39110501
PMCPMC11339581

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.