Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39114347›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2024

Role of ursolic acid in preventing gastrointestinal cancer: recent trends and future perspectives.

Abhishek Chauhan, Vinay Mohan Pathak, Monika Yadav, Ritu Chauhan, Neelesh Babu, Manish Chowdhary, Anuj Ranjan, Darin Mansor Mathkor, Shafiul Haque, Hardeep Singh Tuli and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Nanoimmunotherapy: the smart trooper for cancer therapy.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Abhishek ChauhanAmity Institute of Environmental Toxicology Safety and Management, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Vinay Mohan PathakParwatiya Shiksha Sabha (PASS), Haldwani, India.
Monika YadavCancer Biology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
Ritu ChauhanDepartment of Biotechnology, Graphic Era Deemed to be University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Neelesh BabuDepartment of Microbiology, Baba Farid Institute of Technology, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Manish ChowdharyCSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India.
Anuj RanjanAcademy of Biology and Biotechnology, Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia.
Darin Mansor MathkorResearch and Scientific Studies Unit, College of Nursing and Allied Health Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Shafiul HaqueResearch and Scientific Studies Unit, College of Nursing and Allied Health Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Hardeep Singh TuliDepartment of Bio-Sciences and Technology, Maharishi Markandeshwar Engineering College, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to Be University), Ambala, India.
Seema RamniwasUniversity Centre for Research and Development, University Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chandigarh University, Mohali, India.
Vikas YadavDepartment of Translational Medicine, Clinical Research Centre, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastrointestinal malignancies are one of the major worldwide health concerns. In the present review, we have assessed the plausible therapeutic implication of Ursolic Acid (UA) against gastrointestinal cancer. By modulating several signaling pathways critical in cancer development, UA could offer anti-inflammatory, anti-proliferative, and anti-metastatic properties. However, being of low oral bioavailability and poor permeability, its clinical value is restricted. To deliver and protect the drug, liposomes and polymer micelles are two UA nanoformulations that can effectively increase medicine stability. The use of UA for treating cancers is safe and appropriate with low toxicity characteristics and a predictable pharmacokinetic profile. Although the bioavailability of UA is limited, its nanoformulations could emerge as an alternative to enhance its efficacy in treating GI cancers. Further optimization and validation in the clinical trials are necessary. The combination of molecular profiling with nanoparticle-based drug delivery technologies holds the potential for bringing UA to maximum efficacy, looking for good prospects with GI cancer treatment.

Indexed as

anticancer therapygastrointestinal cancermolecular profilingnanoformulationsnanoparticle-based drug deliveryursolic acid

Identifiers

PMID39114347
PMCPMC11303223

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.