Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39115048›Full record

ArticleAnnals of neurology2024

Mutant Huntingtin Drives Development of an Advantageous Brain Early in Life: Evidence in Support of Antagonistic Pleiotropy.

Mohit Neema, Jordan L Schultz, Douglas R Langbehn, Amy L Conrad, Eric A Epping, Vincent A Magnotta, Peggy C Nopoulos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Movement disorders: a brief overview from an evolutionary perspective.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohit NeemaDepartment of Psychiatry, Carver College of Medicine at the University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-5047-0166
Jordan L SchultzDepartment of Psychiatry, Carver College of Medicine at the University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0985-7268
Douglas R LangbehnDepartment of Psychiatry, Carver College of Medicine at the University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Amy L ConradStead Family Department of Pediatrics, Carver College of Medicine at the University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Eric A EppingDepartment of Psychiatry, Carver College of Medicine at the University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Vincent A MagnottaDepartment of Radiology, Carver College of Medicine at the University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Peggy C NopoulosDepartment of Psychiatry, Carver College of Medicine at the University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.

Funding

Longitudinal Assessment of Brain Structure and Function in Juvenile Onset Huntington's DiseaseU01NS055903 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI NOPOULOS, PEGGY C · 2019 to 2025
$17.4M
University of Iowa Hawkeye Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center (Hawk-IDDRC)P50HD103556 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI EDWIN TED G. ABEL, Lane Strathearn · 2021 to 2026
$8.5M
Growth and Development of the Striatum in Huntington's DiseaseR01NS055903 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI PEGGY C NOPOULOS · 2009 to 2026
$5.0M
University of Iowa - Research 3T MRI Connectome UpgradeS10OD025025 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI MAGNOTTA, VINCENT A · 2018 to 2018
$1.9M
CHDI Foundation 071108NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103556NIH HHS 1S10OD025025-01NIH HHS S10 OD025025NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS055903NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS055903
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHuntington's disease (HD) is a neurodegenerative disease caused by a triplet repeat expansion within the gene huntingtin (HTT). Antagonistic pleiotropy is a theory of aging that posits that some genes, facilitating individual fitness early in life through adaptive evolutionary changes, also augment detrimental aging-related processes. Antagonistic pleiotropy theory may explain a positive evolutionary pressure toward functionally advantageous brain development that is vulnerable to rapid degeneration. The current study investigated antagonistic pleiotropy in HD using a years-to-onset paradigm in a unique sample of children and young adults at risk for HD.

methodsCognitive, behavioral, motor, and brain structural measures from premanifest gene-expanded (n = 79) and gene nonexpanded (n = 112) participants (6-21 years) in the Kids-HD study were examined. All measures in the gene-expanded group were modeled using a mixed-effects regression approach to assess years-to-onset-based changes while controlling for normal growth. Simultaneously, structure-function associations were also examined.

resultsDecades from motor onset, gene-expanded participants showed significantly better cognitive, behavioral, and motor scores versus gene nonexpanded controls, along with larger cerebral volumes and cortical features. After this initial peak, a prolonged deterioration was observed in both functional and structural measures. Far from onset, brain measures were positively correlated with functional measures, supporting the view that functional advantages were mediated by structural differences.

interpretationMutant HTT may drive the development of a larger than normal brain that subserves superior early-life function. These findings support the antagonistic pleiotropy theory of HTT in HD, where this gene drives early advantage followed by accelerated aging processes. ANN NEUROL 2024;96:1006-1019.

Indexed as

BrainGenetic PleiotropyHuntingtin ProteinHuntington DiseaseAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung AdultHTT protein, humanHuntingtin Protein

Identifiers

PMID39115048
PMCPMC11496017

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.