Evidence mapPaperPMID 39117997Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2024

Regression without regrets -initial data analysis is a prerequisite for multivariable regression.

Georg Heinze, Mark Baillie, Lara Lusa, Willi Sauerbrei, Carsten Oliver Schmidt, Frank E Harrell, Marianne Huebner, TG2 and TG3 of the STRATOS initiative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Georg HeinzeCenter for Medical Data Science, Institute of Clinical Biometrics, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria. georg.heinze@meduniwien.ac.at.
Mark BaillieNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Lara LusaFaculty of Mathematics, Department of Mathematics, University of Primorska, Natural Sciences and Information Technology, Koper, Slovenia.
Willi SauerbreiFaculty of Medicine and Medical Center, Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Carsten Oliver SchmidtInstitute of Community Medicine, University Medicine of Greifswald, SHIP-KEF, Greifswald, Germany.
Frank E HarrellSchool of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Marianne HuebnerDepartment of Statistics and Probability, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
TG2 and TG3 of the STRATOS initiative

Funding

Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR002243 · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · 2025 to 2025
$10.7M
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SA 580/10-3NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002243US National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences CTSA award No. UL1 TR002243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Statistical regression models are used for predicting outcomes based on the values of some predictor variables or for describing the association of an outcome with predictors. With a data set at hand, a regression model can be easily fit with standard software packages. This bears the risk that data analysts may rush to perform sophisticated analyses without sufficient knowledge of basic properties, associations in and errors of their data, leading to wrong interpretation and presentation of the modeling results that lacks clarity. Ignorance about special features of the data such as redundancies or particular distributions may even invalidate the chosen analysis strategy. Initial data analysis (IDA) is prerequisite to regression analyses as it provides knowledge about the data needed to confirm the appropriateness of or to refine a chosen model building strategy, to interpret the modeling results correctly, and to guide the presentation of modeling results. In order to facilitate reproducibility, IDA needs to be preplanned, an IDA plan should be included in the general statistical analysis plan of a research project, and results should be well documented. Biased statistical inference of the final regression model can be minimized if IDA abstains from evaluating associations of outcome and predictors, a key principle of IDA. We give advice on which aspects to consider in an IDA plan for data screening in the context of regression modeling to supplement the statistical analysis plan. We illustrate this IDA plan for data screening in an example of a typical diagnostic modeling project and give recommendations for data visualizations.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalData AnalysisData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansMultivariate AnalysisRegression AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsSoftwareData screeningFunctional formIDA frameworkInitial data analysisRegression modelsReportingSTRATOS InitiativeVariable selectionVariable transformation

Identifiers

PMID39117997
PMCPMC11308558

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.