ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2024
A hybrid approach for predicting transcription factors.
Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ovarian transcriptome analyses indicate that weak juvenile hormone signaling underlies the molecular basis of oogenesis deficiencies in mosquitoes.BMC biology · 2025Article
- Chromosome-scale assemblies of three Ormosia species: repetitive sequences distribution and structural rearrangement.GigaScience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcription factors are essential DNA-binding proteins that regulate the transcription rate of several genes and control the expression of genes inside a cell. The prediction of transcription factors with high precision is important for understanding biological processes such as cell differentiation, intracellular signaling, and cell-cycle control. In this study, we developed a hybrid method that combines alignment-based and alignment-free methods for predicting transcription factors with higher accuracy. All models have been trained, tested, and evaluated on a large dataset that contains 19,406 transcription factors and 523,560 non-transcription factor protein sequences. To avoid biases in evaluation, the datasets were divided into training and validation/independent datasets, where 80% of the data was used for training, and the remaining 20% was used for external validation. In the case of alignment-free methods, models were developed using machine learning techniques and the composition-based features of a protein. Our best alignment-free model obtained an AUC of 0.97 on an independent dataset. In the case of the alignment-based method, we used BLAST at different cut-offs to predict the transcription factors. Although the alignment-based method demonstrated excellent performance, it was unable to cover all transcription factors due to instances of no hits. To combine the strengths of both methods, we developed a hybrid method that combines alignment-free and alignment-based methods. In the hybrid method, we added the scores of the alignment-free and alignment-based methods and achieved a maximum AUC of 0.99 on the independent dataset. The method proposed in this study performs better than existing methods. We incorporated the best models in the webserver/Python Package Index/standalone package of "TransFacPred" (https://webs.iiitd.edu.in/raghava/transfacpred).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.