ArticleBioelectricity2024
Cardiomyocytes Permeabilization and Electrotransfection by Unipolar and Bipolar Asymmetric Electric Field Pulses.
Article in Bioelectricity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields (nsPEFs) for Precision Intracellular Oncotherapy: Recent Advances and Emerging Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Short electric field pulses represent a novel potential approach for achieving uniform electroporation within tissue containing elongated cells oriented in various directions, such as electroporation-based cardiac ablation procedures. In this study, we investigated how electroporation with nanosecond pulses with respect to different pulse shapes (unipolar, bipolar, and asymmetric) influences cardiomyocyte permeabilization and gene transfer. For this purpose, rat cardiomyocytes (H9c2) were used. The efficacy of the pulsed electric field protocols was assessed by flow cytometry and electrogene transfer by fluorescent and holotomographic microscopy. The response of the cells was assessed by the metabolic activity (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide [MTT] assay), F-actin distribution in cells by confocal microscopy, and muscle atrophy F-box (MAFbx) marker. We show nano- and microsecond pulse protocols, which are not cytotoxic for cardiac muscle cells and can be efficiently used for gene electrotransfection. Asymmetric nanosecond pulsed electric fields were similarly efficient in plasmid delivery as microsecond and millisecond protocols. However, the millisecond protocol induced a higher MAFbx expression in H9c2 cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.