Evidence mapPaperPMID 39119982Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American Heart Association2024

2023 International Evidence-Based Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Guideline Update: Insights From a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Elevated Clinical Cardiovascular Disease in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Chau Thien Tay, Aya Mousa, Aadhya Vyas, Loyal Pattuwage, Fahimeh Ramezani Tehrani, Helena Teede

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chau Thien TayMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University Clayton Victoria Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6228-2654
Aya MousaMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University Clayton Victoria Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7356-4523
Aadhya VyasMonash School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University Clayton Victoria Australia.
Loyal PattuwageMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University Clayton Victoria Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1776-8791
Fahimeh Ramezani TehraniReproductive Endocrinology Research Center Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-4609-065X
Helena TeedeMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University Clayton Victoria Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7609-577X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most prevalent female endocrinopathy. Although increased cardiovascular risk factors are well established for the syndrome, PCOS remains overlooked within the realm of cardiology. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the risk of clinical cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in women with PCOS to inform the 2023 International Evidence-Based PCOS Guideline. METHODS AND

resultsA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted comparing the risk of clinical CVD events in women with and without PCOS. Medline (Ovid), PsycInfo (Ovid), EMBASE, All EBM (Ovid), and CINAHL were searched from January 1, 2017, until March 1, 2023, to update the 2018 PCOS Guideline. Pooled odds ratios (ORs), incidence rate ratios (IRRs), and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated. Twenty studies involving 1.06 million women (369 317 with PCOS and 692 963 without PCOS) were included. PCOS was associated with higher risk of composite CVD (OR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.26-2.23]; I

conclusionsThis review provides evidence and highlights the importance of recognizing PCOS as a significant risk factor for CVD morbidity. The 2023 International Evidence-Based PCOS Guideline now recommends awareness of increased CVD risk and comprehensive risk assessment in PCOS to help mitigate the burden of CVD in this common and high-risk condition.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesPolycystic Ovary SyndromePractice Guidelines as TopicEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansRisk AssessmentRisk Factorscardiovascular diseaseguidelinemeta‐analysispolycystic ovary syndromewomen's health

Identifiers

PMID39119982
PMCPMC11963914

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.