ArticleScientific reports2024
Influence of silver nanoparticles' size on their direct interactions with doxorubicin and its biological effects.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Platinum Nanoparticles as Modulators of Idarubicin Activity: A Physicochemical and In Vitro Biological Study.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Role and Potential of Nanotechnology in Improving Solubility and Enhancing Bioavailability.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Silver Nanoparticles as Anticancer Agents: Mechanisms Insight, Current Studies, and Limitations.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Assessing cytotoxic and antibacterial effects of high dispersion-stable sub-5 nm silver particles fabricated by ionic liquid-mediated electrochemical synthesis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- The effect of platinum nanoparticles on the physicochemical properties of daunorubicin.RSC advances · 2025Article
- An uphill path to commercialization of silver nanoparticle antimicrobials: from bench to market.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of cancer's most deadly varieties. Its variability makes the development of personalized therapies very difficult. Therefore, improvement of classic chemotherapy is still one of the important challenges of cancer research. We addressed this issue applying nanotechnology to verify the influence of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) on doxorubicin (DOX) anticancer activity and assess if the size of AgNPs affects their interactions with DOX. We employed a broad spectrum of biophysical methods, characterizing 5 and 50 nm AgNPs interactions with DOX using UV-Vis spectroscopy, dynamic light scattering, fluorescence spectroscopy, and atomic force microscopy imaging. Biological effects of observed AgNPs-DOX interactions were assessed utilizing MTT and 3D Matrigel assays on SKBR3 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell lines. Obtained results indicate direct interactions between AgNPs and DOX. Furthermore, AgNPs size influences their interactions with DOX, as evidenced by differences in the heteroaggregates formation observed in biophysical experiments and further supported by in vitro biological assays. We detected reduction of tumor cell viability and/or colony sizes of the analyzed cancer cell lines, registering differences linked to the observed phenomenon. However, the effects may be limited to the outer borders of the tumor microenvironment as evidenced by the 3D model. Summing up, we observed diverse patterns of interactions and biological effects for different sizes of AgNPs with DOX providing insight how the nanoparticles' size affects their interactions with other biologically active compounds. Moreover, obtained data can be further used in experiments on the reduction of tumor size i.e. before the surgical intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.