ArticleBMC gastroenterology2024
AI support for colonoscopy quality control using CNN and transformer architectures.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- External Validation of an AI-Based Colonoscopy Quality Assessment Tool in Japanese Clinical Practice: A Pilot Study.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Computational pathology-based artificial intelligence platform for the identification of common oral potentially malignant disorders.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- GastroMalign: Vision Transformer-Based Framework for Early Detection and Malignancy-Risk Stratification for High-Risk Gastrointestinal Lesions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A Trustable Spine Abnormalities Classification System Using ResNet50 and VGG16 Supported by Explainable Artificial Intelligence.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Overcoming domain-specific challenges for artificial intelligence in abdominal oncology toward clinical translation.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Colonoscopy Quality Indicators in Transition: From Adenoma Detection Rate to Serrated Lesion Detection and Beyond.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Interobserver variability in colonoscopy quality assessment: a retrospective standardized multicenter video-based study.Archive of clinical cases · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in cancer: applications, challenges, and future perspectives.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Application of Explainable Artificial Intelligence Based on Visual Explanation in Digestive Endoscopy.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advancing Colorectal Cancer Diagnostics from Barium Enema to AI-Assisted Colonoscopy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Development of a convolutional neural network-based AI-assisted multi-task colonoscopy withdrawal quality control system (with video).Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- A YOLOv11-based AI system for keypoint detection of auricular acupuncture points in traditional Chinese medicine.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Establishing an AI model and application for automated capsule endoscopy recognition based on convolutional neural networks (with video).BMC gastroenterology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundConstruct deep learning models for colonoscopy quality control using different architectures and explore their decision-making mechanisms.
methodsA total of 4,189 colonoscopy images were collected from two medical centers, covering different levels of bowel cleanliness, the presence of polyps, and the cecum. Using these data, eight pre-trained models based on CNN and Transformer architectures underwent transfer learning and fine-tuning. The models' performance was evaluated using metrics such as AUC, Precision, and F1 score. Perceptual hash functions were employed to detect image changes, enabling real-time monitoring of colonoscopy withdrawal speed. Model interpretability was analyzed using techniques such as Grad-CAM and SHAP. Finally, the best-performing model was converted to ONNX format and deployed on device terminals.
resultsThe EfficientNetB2 model outperformed other architectures on the validation set, achieving an accuracy of 0.992. It surpassed models based on other CNN and Transformer architectures. The model's precision, recall, and F1 score were 0.991, 0.989, and 0.990, respectively. On the test set, the EfficientNetB2 model achieved an average AUC of 0.996, with a precision of 0.948 and a recall of 0.952. Interpretability analysis showed the specific image regions the model used for decision-making. The model was converted to ONNX format and deployed on device terminals, achieving an average inference speed of over 60 frames per second.
conclusionsThe AI-assisted quality system, based on the EfficientNetB2 model, integrates four key quality control indicators for colonoscopy. This integration enables medical institutions to comprehensively manage and enhance these indicators using a single model, showcasing promising potential for clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.