Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39123712›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

Integrated Blood Transcriptome and Multi-Tissue Trace Mineral Analyses of Healthy Stocker Cattle Fed Complexed or Inorganic Trace Mineral Supplement.

Matthew A Scott, Kelsey M Harvey, Brandi B Karisch, Amelia R Woolums, Rebecca M Tracy, Jason R Russell, Chanda L Engel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matthew A ScottVeterinary Education, Research, and Outreach Program, Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX 79015, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5243-7181
Kelsey M HarveyPrairie Research Unit, Mississippi State University, Prairie, MS 39756, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2535-4748
Brandi B KarischDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9805-4626
Amelia R WoolumsDepartment of Pathobiology and Population Medicine, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7179-0615
Rebecca M TracyVeterinary Education, Research, and Outreach Program, Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX 79015, USA.
Jason R RussellZinpro Corporation, Eden Prairie, MN 55344, USA.
Chanda L EngelZinpro Corporation, Eden Prairie, MN 55344, USA.

Funding

Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station Strategic Research Initiative N/AZinpro Corporation G00006247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Supplementing trace minerals is common in managing bovine respiratory disease (BRD) in post-weaned cattle; however, its influence on host immunity and metabolism in high-risk cattle remains unclear. We aimed to assess the impact of three supplementation programs on liver and serum trace element concentrations and blood gene expression. Fifty-six high-risk beef steers were randomly assigned to one of three groups over 60 days: (1) sulfate-sourced Cu, Co, Mn, and Zn (INR), (2) amino acid-complexed Cu, Mn, Co, and Zn (AAC), or (3) AAC plus trace mineral and vitamin drench (COMBO). Serum and liver biopsies for Cu, Co, Mn, and Zn at d0, d28, and d60 were analyzed from cattle free of BRD (n = 9 INR; n = 6 AAC; n = 10 COMBO). Differences and correlations of mineral concentrations were analyzed via generalized linear mixed models and Spearman's rank coefficients, respectively (

Indexed as

beef cattlecopperimmunitylivernutritionRNA sequencingserumsupplementationT-celltrace element

Identifiers

PMID39123712
PMCPMC11311009

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.