Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39124049›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

A Review of Digital Twinning for Rotating Machinery.

Vamsi Inturi, Bidisha Ghosh, Sabareesh Geetha Rajasekharan, Vikram Pakrashi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vamsi InturiMechanical Engineering Department, Chaitanya Bharathi Institute of Technology (A), Hyderabad 500075, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7878-6539
Bidisha GhoshQuant Group, Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, D02 PN40 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-1924-3040
Sabareesh Geetha RajasekharanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology & Science Pilani, Hyderabad Campus, Pilani 500078, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3882-6225
Vikram PakrashiUCD Centre for Mechanics, Dynamical Systems and Risk Laboratory, School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-8318-3521

Funding

Department of Science and Technology, Government of India CRG scheme CRG/2022/002439Science Foundation Ireland MaREI RC2302_2Science Foundation Ireland NexSys 21/SPP/3756Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland FlowDyn RDD/966Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland RDD/613Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland TwinFarm RDD/604
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review focuses on the definitions, modalities, applications, and performance of various aspects of digital twins (DTs) in the context of transmission and industrial machinery. In this regard, the context around Industry 4.0 and even aspirations for Industry 5.0 are discussed. The many definitions and interpretations of DTs in this domain are first summarized. Subsequently, their adoption and performance levels for rotating and industrial machineries for manufacturing and lifetime performance are observed, along with the type of validations that are available. A significant focus on integrating fundamental operations of the system and scenarios over the lifetime, with sensors and advanced machine or deep learning, along with other statistical or data-driven methods are highlighted. This review summarizes how individual aspects around DTs are extremely helpful for lifetime design, manufacturing, or decision making even when a DT can remain incomplete or limited.

Indexed as

digital twinindustrialmachine learningrotating machinerytransmission

Identifiers

PMID39124049
PMCPMC11314717

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.