Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39129396›Full record

Observational studyAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2024

Psychosocial implications of learning amyloid PET results in an observational cohort.

Lindsay R Clark, Claire M Erickson, Nathaniel A Chin, Kristin E Basche, Fred B Ketchum, Hannah L Rosario, Amanda J Peterson, Marcella L Eveler, Sterling C Johnson

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Return of research results across the Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers network.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Psychosocial implications of learning amyloid PET results in an observational cohort.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lindsay R ClarkDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics & Gerontology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Claire M EricksonDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Nathaniel A ChinDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics & Gerontology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Kristin E BascheDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics & Gerontology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Fred B KetchumDepartment of Neurology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Hannah L RosarioDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics & Gerontology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Amanda J PetersonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics & Gerontology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Marcella L EvelerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics & Gerontology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Sterling C JohnsonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics & Gerontology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Funding

Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention: Sex Differences in DNA MethylationR01AG027161 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Nathaniel Ark Chin, Sterling C Johnson · 2007 to 2026
$35.6M
The Longitudinal Course of Neural Function and Amyloid in People At Risk for ADR01AG021155 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Sterling C Johnson · 2004 to 2026
$27.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG021155NIA NIH HHS R01 AG027161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInformation on the psychosocial impact of Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker testing in adults at risk of AD is needed to inform best practices for communicating biomarker results.

methodsNinety-nine cognitively unimpaired older adults learned amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) results (mean age = 72.0 ± 4.8, 95% White, 28% elevated amyloid). Linear mixed-effects regression models were used to test the main effects and interaction of PET result × time on psychosocial outcomes up to 6 months after learning results.

resultsA significant interaction of PET result × time was observed for concern about AD (β = 0.28, p = 0.02) and intrusive thoughts and avoidance (β = -0.82, p < 0.001). A main effect of PET result was observed for AD test-related distress (β = 12.09, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Cognitively unimpaired adults learning elevated-amyloid PET results reported mildly intrusive thoughts/avoidance initially following disclosure, but these symptoms decreased over time. Concern about AD dementia and AD biomarker test-related distress remained higher in elevated-amyloid compared to non-elevated-amyloid participants. HIGHLIGHTS: Longitudinal assessment of psychosocial reactions after amyloid PET disclosure was conducted. Transient highly intrusive thoughts or avoidance after learning elevated amyloid results. Persistent test result-related distress after receiving elevated-amyloid results. There is increased concern about AD dementia after receiving elevated-amyloid results. Happiness and relief are experienced after receiving non-elevated-amyloid results.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseBiomarkersPositron-Emission TomographyAgedAmyloidCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLearningMaleAmyloidBiomarkersadvanced planningAlzheimer'samyloidbiomarker disclosurecognitiondementiaperceived riskpsychologicalpsychosocialrisk communicationtest‐related distress

Identifiers

PMID39129396
PMCPMC11497643

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.