ReviewCureus2024
Comparison of the Clinical Manifestations of Acute Coronary Syndrome Between Diabetic and Non-diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The presentation of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) may differ from that of non-diabetic patients, potentially leading to delayed diagnosis and treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical presentation of ACS between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. A systematic search of PubMed, Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), and Web of Science databases was conducted for observational studies published from January 2010 onwards. Studies comparing ACS symptoms between diabetic and non-diabetic patients were included. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was calculated using a random-effects model. Eight studies with a total of 29,503 patients (23.03% diabetic) were included. Diabetic patients were significantly less likely to present with chest pain compared to non-diabetic patients (OR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.63, p<0.001). Anxiety (OR: 2.20, 95% CI: 1.17-4.14), shortness of breath (OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.11-2.01), and neck pain (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.03-2.54) were significantly more common in diabetic patients. Sweating/cold sweat was less common in diabetics (OR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.34-1.07), though not statistically significant. Other symptoms showed minimal differences between groups. High heterogeneity was observed across studies for most symptoms. This meta-analysis demonstrates that diabetic patients with ACS are less likely to experience typical chest pain and more likely to present with atypical symptoms such as anxiety, shortness of breath, and neck pain. These findings emphasize the need for healthcare providers to maintain high vigilance for atypical ACS presentations in diabetic patients. Tailored diagnostic approaches, modified triage protocols, and enhanced patient education are crucial to improving the timely diagnosis and treatment of ACS in this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.