ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
Association between psychiatric disorders and intracranial aneurysms: evidence from Mendelian randomization analysis.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Several studies have explored the relationship between intracranial aneurysms and psychiatric disorders; nevertheless, the causal connection remains ambiguous. This study aimed to evaluate the causal link between intracranial aneurysms and specific psychiatric disorders. Methods: A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was conducted utilizing aggregated genome-wide association study (GWAS) data from the International Stroke Genetics Association for Intracranial Aneurysms (IAs), unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm (uIA), and aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (aSAH). Psychiatric disorder data, encompassing Schizophrenia (SCZ), Bipolar Disorder (BD), and Panic Disorder (PD), were sourced from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC), while Cognitive Impairment (CI) data, comprising Cognitive Function (CF) and Cognitive Performance (CP), were obtained from IEU OpenGWAS publications. Causal effects were evaluated using inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger, and weighted median methods, with the robustness of findings assessed via sensitivity analyses employing diverse methodological approaches. Results: Our MR analysis indicated no discernible causal link between intracranial aneurysm (IA) and an elevated susceptibility to psychiatric disorders. However, among individuals with genetically predisposed unruptured intracranial aneurysms (uIA), there was a modest reduction in the risk of SCZ (IVW odds ratio [OR] = 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-0.98, Conclusion: Our findings furnish compelling evidence suggesting a causal influence of intracranial aneurysms on psychiatric disorders, specifically, both IAs and uIA exhibit a negative causal association with SCZ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.