Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39131074›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions

Emerging Device Therapies for Cardiorenal Syndrome.

Sandeep Nathan, Mir B Basir

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sandeep NathanUniversity of Chicago Medicine, Heart and Vascular Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Mir B BasirDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the existence of cardiorenal perturbations has been known for nearly 2 centuries, only in the past 2 decades has significant progress been made in classifying these alterations and characterizing the pathobiology and hemodynamic signature of cardiorenal syndrome (CRS). Empiric intravenous diuretic therapy with fluid and sodium restriction and selective use of vasoactive agents have remained cornerstones of managing acute heart failure with or without acute CRS; however, recent clinical data has exposed the shortcomings of this approach. The traditional view of CRS has long focused on low cardiac output with resultant renal arterial hypoperfusion as the central hemodynamic derangement but this too, has been challenged by new preclinical and clinical observations. Renal venous congestion/hypertension has since been identified as an important hemodynamic contributor to the development of CRS, resulting in diminished renal perfusion pressure, defined as the difference between arterial driving pressure and renal venous pressure. Novel circulatory renal assist devices for the treatment of acute (type I) CRS are in development and may be divided into 2 broad categories: "pushers" which aim to improve renal arterial perfusion (renal preload) and "pullers" which are designed to reduce renal venous congestion (renal afterload). Numerous devices have shown promise in early-stage clinical studies but none have been approved yet for commercial use in the United States. The value of CRS device therapies will ultimately rest on safety as well as the ability of these devices to effect predictable, meaningful, and durable improvements in renal function along with clinical and hemodynamic markers of congestion.

Indexed as

cardiorenal syndromecirculatory devicesheart failure

Identifiers

PMID39131074
PMCPMC11307833

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.