Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39132382›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of public health2024

Health Workforce Challenges: Key Findings From the Swiss Cohort of Healthcare Professionals and Informal Caregivers (SCOHPICA).

Vladimir Jolidon, Jonathan Jubin, Emilie Zuercher, Leonard Roth, Tania Carron, Annie Oulevey Bachmann, Ingrid Gilles, Isabelle Peytremann-Bridevaux

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05571488 (Swiss Cohort of Health Professionals and Informal Caregivers - SCOHPICA), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05571488 recruitingnot on this map

Swiss Cohort of Health Professionals and Informal Caregivers - SCOHPICA

TypeobservationalSponsorCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisante), University of Lausanne, SwitzerlandRan2022 to 2026Enrolled6,000ConditionsHealthcare Professional, Informal CaregiverArmsElectronic surveys, Qualitative Interviews
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vladimir JolidonUnisanté, University Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Health Systems, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jonathan JubinUnisanté, University Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Health Systems, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Emilie ZuercherUnisanté, University Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Health Systems, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Leonard RothUnisanté, University Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Health Systems, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Tania CarronUnisanté, University Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Health Systems, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Annie Oulevey BachmannUnisanté, University Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Health Systems, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ingrid GillesUnisanté, University Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Health Systems, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Isabelle Peytremann-BridevauxUnisanté, University Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Health Systems, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The Swiss Cohort of Healthcare Professionals and Informal Caregivers (SCOHPICA) was created to study the career trajectories, retention intentions, and wellbeing of healthcare professionals (HCPs), addressing challenges such as staff turnover, low job satisfaction and burnout. Methods: SCOHPICA is a prospective open cohort. An electronic questionnaire was used to collect data from HCPs across multiple healthcare settings in Switzerland, encompassing the intention to stay in the profession, wellbeing, and various organizational, psychosocial, occupational and sociodemographic determinants. Results: The first (2022) baseline sample included 1707 HCPs from over 20 professions. Notably, 13% did not intend to stay in their profession, with intermediate caregivers (24%), registered nurses (17%) and pharmacists (17%) reporting the highest rates. Pharmacists scored lowest in wellbeing. Across determinants, pharmacists, physicians, and registered nurses reported worse scores for workload and work-life balance. Nursing professions had lower scores in various determinants, including influence at work, staffing and resource adequacy, and possibilities for development. Conclusion: SCOHPICA will provide critical insights on HCPs' work conditions and experiences, supporting health workforce monitoring and management, and informing policy-making to ensure high-quality healthcare delivery.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalCaregiversHealth PersonnelJob SatisfactionPersonnel TurnoverWorkloadAdultFemaleHealth WorkforceHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesSwitzerlandcohort studyhealthcare professionalsprofessional trajectoriesretention intentionswell-being

Identifiers

PMID39132382
PMCPMC11310572

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.