ArticleGenome research2024
Bayesian inference of sample-specific coexpression networks.
Article in Genome research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Personalized single-cell transcriptomics reveals molecular diversity in Alzheimer's disease.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Cell line-specific gene network enrichment analysis for interpreting continuous phenotypes.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Local transcriptional covariation produces accurate estimates of cell phenotype.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Challenges and Opportunities in Single-Sample Network Modeling.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Multimodal bioinformatic analyses of genome-scale expression beyond gene-centric differential expression.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Sex differences in thyroid aging and their implications in thyroid disorders: insights from gene regulatory networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Sample-specific network analysis identifies gene co-expression patterns of immunotherapy response in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.iScience · 2025Article
- Aging-associated alterations in gene regulatory networks associate with risk, prognosis and response to therapy in lung adenocarcinoma.npj aging · 2025Article
- Reproducible processing of TCGA regulatory networks.GigaScience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) are effective tools for inferring complex interactions between molecules that regulate biological processes and hence can provide insights into drivers of biological systems. Inferring coexpression networks is a critical element of GRN inference, as the correlation between expression patterns may indicate that genes are coregulated by common factors. However, methods that estimate coexpression networks generally derive an aggregate network representing the mean regulatory properties of the population and so fail to fully capture population heterogeneity. Bayesian optimized networks obtained by assimilating omic data (BONOBO) is a scalable Bayesian model for deriving individual sample-specific coexpression matrices that recognizes variations in molecular interactions across individuals. For each sample, BONOBO assumes a Gaussian distribution on the log-transformed centered gene expression and a conjugate prior distribution on the sample-specific coexpression matrix constructed from all other samples in the data. Combining the sample-specific gene coexpression with the prior distribution, BONOBO yields a closed-form solution for the posterior distribution of the sample-specific coexpression matrices, thus allowing the analysis of large data sets. We demonstrate BONOBO's utility in several contexts, including analyzing gene regulation in yeast transcription factor knockout studies, the prognostic significance of miRNA-mRNA interaction in human breast cancer subtypes, and sex differences in gene regulation within human thyroid tissue. We find that BONOBO outperforms other methods that have been used for sample-specific coexpression network inference and provides insight into individual differences in the drivers of biological processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.