Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39134592›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Hebbian plasticity induced by temporally coincident BCI enhances post-stroke motor recovery.

Johanna Krueger, Richard Krauth, Christoph Reichert, Serafeim Perdikis, Susanne Vogt, Tessa Huchtemann, Stefan Dürschmid, Almut Sickert, Juliane Lamprecht, Almir Huremovic and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Brain-Computer Interfaces for Stroke Motor Rehabilitation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Johanna KruegerNeurocybernetics and Rehabilitation, Department of Neurology, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Richard KrauthNeurocybernetics and Rehabilitation, Department of Neurology, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Christoph ReichertLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany.
Serafeim PerdikisSchool of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2033-2486
Susanne VogtNeurocybernetics and Rehabilitation, Department of Neurology, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Tessa HuchtemannNeurocybernetics and Rehabilitation, Department of Neurology, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Stefan DürschmidLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany.
Almut SickertNeurorehabilitation Centre, MEDIAN, Magdeburg, Germany.
Juliane LamprechtNeurorehabilitation Centre, MEDIAN, Magdeburg, Germany.
Almir HuremovicNeurorehabilitation Centre, MEDIAN, Magdeburg, Germany.
Michael GörtlerDepartment of Neurology, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Slawomir J NasutoBiomedical Engineering, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
I-Chin TsaiNeurocybernetics and Rehabilitation, Department of Neurology, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Robert T KnightHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California -Berkeley, Berkeley, USA.
Hermann HinrichsLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany.
Hans-Jochen HeinzeLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany.
Sabine LindquistDepartment of Neurology, Pfeiffersche Stiftung, Magdeburg, Germany.
Michael SailerNeurorehabilitation Centre, MEDIAN, Magdeburg, Germany.
Jose Del R MillánChandra Family Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA.
Catherine M Sweeney-ReedNeurocybernetics and Rehabilitation, Department of Neurology, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany. catherine.sweeney-reed@med.ovgu.de.ORCID 0000-0002-3684-1245

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional electrical stimulation (FES) can support functional restoration of a paretic limb post-stroke. Hebbian plasticity depends on temporally coinciding pre- and post-synaptic activity. A tight temporal relationship between motor cortical (MC) activity associated with attempted movement and FES-generated visuo-proprioceptive feedback is hypothesized to enhance motor recovery. Using a brain-computer interface (BCI) to classify MC spectral power in electroencephalographic (EEG) signals to trigger FES-delivery with detection of movement attempts improved motor outcomes in chronic stroke patients. We hypothesized that heightened neural plasticity earlier post-stroke would further enhance corticomuscular functional connectivity and motor recovery. We compared subcortical non-dominant hemisphere stroke patients in BCI-FES and Random-FES (FES temporally independent of MC movement attempt detection) groups. The primary outcome measure was the Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Extremity (FMA-UE). We recorded high-density EEG and transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor evoked potentials before and after treatment. The BCI group showed greater: FMA-UE improvement; motor evoked potential amplitude; beta oscillatory power and long-range temporal correlation reduction over contralateral MC; and corticomuscular coherence with contralateral MC. These changes are consistent with enhanced post-stroke motor improvement when movement is synchronized with MC activity reflecting attempted movement.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, MotorMotor CortexNeuronal PlasticityRecovery of FunctionStrokeStroke RehabilitationTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAcute strokeBCIBrain–computer interfaceEEGFESFMAFugl-Meyer assessmentFunctional electrical stimulationSubacute strokeTMSUpper limb rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID39134592
PMCPMC11319604

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.