Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39135126›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

Efficacy and safety of minodronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with low back pain: a single-centre, randomized and open-label controlled trial.

Huan Wang, Jie Huang, Liyuan Tao, Dongyang Liu, Chunli Song

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05645289 (Efficacy and Safety of Minodronate in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis With Low Back Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05645289 phase4unknown statusnot on this map

Efficacy and Safety of Minodronate in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis With Low Back Pain: a Single-centre and Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking University Third HospitalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled72ConditionsPostmenopausal OsteoporosisArmsMinodronate, Alendronate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Huan WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jie HuangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Liyuan TaoResearch Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Dongyang LiuDrug Clinical Trial Center, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China. liudongyang@vip.sina.com.
Chunli SongDepartment of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China. schl@bjmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3690-9457

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow back pain is one of the most common symptoms of osteoporosis. The pain can seriously affect patients' mood and quality of life; it can also further aggravate bone loss, causing a serious social burden. Minodronate is an oral bisphosphonate that needs to be administered daily. It significantly reduces levels of bone turnover markers (BTMs) and rapidly improves symptoms of low back pain in patients with osteoporosis. Osteoporosis requires long-term treatment, and daily dosing reduces patient compliance. Minodronate has a better safety profile than other bisphosphonates. The objective of the trial is to explore the efficacy and safety of minodronate in the treatment of low back pain in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients.

methodsThis is a single-centre, randomized, open-label controlled trial with a 24-week duration. Seventy-two eligible patients will be randomly divided into 4 groups. Subjects will be randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive either minodronate (1 mg/day) or alendronate (10 mg/day) every day; senior women (≥ 75 years old) and older women (< 75 years old) will be at a ratio of 1:2. The primary outcome is the time required for the visual analogue scale (VAS) score to decline by ≥ 10 from baseline. The secondary outcome is the changes in VAS scores from baseline, the frequency and dosage of rescue medication, BTMs, bone mineral density (BMD), and variations in upper gastrointestinal (GI) symptom scores from baseline (including heartburn, pain, and bloating). DISCUSSION: This study will provide objective evidence for the efficiency and safety of minodronate. Furthermore, it will be helpful to evaluate the quantitative relationship between BTMs and BMD in patients with osteoporosis under different ages.

trial registrationThis study protocol has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05645289 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/search?term=NCT05645289 ) on December 8, 2022. The registry name is Peking University Third Hospital. This study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Peking University Third Hospital Medical Science Research Ethics Committee (M2022465, 2022.08.09, V2.0). The results will be published in scientific peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL STATUS: The protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number: NCT05645289). Recruitment has started in January 2023 and is still ongoing.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphonatesImidazolesLow Back PainOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAgedAlendronateBone DensityFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPain MeasurementTreatment OutcomeAlendronateBone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphonatesImidazolesYM 529Adverse reactionsLow back painMinodronateOsteoporosisPharmacodynamic

Identifiers

PMID39135126
PMCPMC11321119

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.