Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39135800›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024

Machine learning-based prediction model for the efficacy and safety of statins.

Yu Xiong, Xiaoyang Liu, Qing Wang, Li Zhao, Xudong Kong, Chunhe Da, Zuohuan Meng, Leilei Qu, Qinfang Xia, Lihong Liu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yu XiongInstitute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xiaoyang LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qing WangDepartment of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Li ZhaoDepartment of Pharmacy, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xudong KongDepartment of Pharmacy, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chunhe DaRespiratory Center of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Baiyin, China.
Zuohuan MengInstitute of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Baiyin, China.
Leilei QuRespiratory and Critical Care Medical Center, Baiyin First People's Hospital, Baiyin, China.
Qinfang XiaDepartment of Information Center, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lihong LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Pengmei LiDepartment of Pharmacy, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The appropriate use of statins plays a vital role in reducing the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, due to changes in diet and lifestyle, there has been a significant increase in the number of individuals with high cholesterol levels. Therefore, it is crucial to ensure the rational use of statins. Adverse reactions associated with statins, including liver enzyme abnormalities and statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS), have impacted their widespread utilization. In this study, we aimed to develop a predictive model for statin efficacy and safety based on real-world clinical data using machine learning techniques. Methods: We employed various data preprocessing techniques, such as improved random forest imputation and Borderline SMOTE oversampling, to handle the dataset. Boruta method was utilized for feature selection, and the dataset was divided into training and testing sets in a 7:3 ratio. Five algorithms, including logistic regression, naive Bayes, decision tree, random forest, and gradient boosting decision tree, were used to construct the predictive models. Ten-fold cross-validation and bootstrapping sampling were performed for internal and external validation. Additionally, SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) was employed for feature interpretability. Ultimately, an accessible web-based platform for predicting statin efficacy and safety was established based on the optimal predictive model. Results: The random forest algorithm exhibited the best performance among the five algorithms. The predictive models for LDL-C target attainment (AUC = 0.883, Accuracy = 0.868, Precision = 0.858, Recall = 0.863, F1 = 0.860, AUPRC = 0.906, MCC = 0.761), liver enzyme abnormalities (AUC = 0.964, Accuracy = 0.964, Precision = 0.967, Recall = 0.963, F1 = 0.965, AUPRC = 0.978, MCC = 0.938), and muscle pain/Creatine kinase (CK) abnormalities (AUC = 0.981, Accuracy = 0.980, Precision = 0.987, Recall = 0.975, F1 = 0.981, AUPRC = 0.987, MCC = 0.965) demonstrated favorable performance. The most important features of LDL-C target attainment prediction model was cerebral infarction, TG, PLT and HDL. The most important features of liver enzyme abnormalities model was CRP, CK and number of oral medications. Similarly, AST, ALT, PLT and number of oral medications were found to be important features for muscle pain/CK abnormalities. Based on the best-performing predictive model, a user-friendly web application was designed and implemented. Conclusion: This study presented a machine learning-based predictive model for statin efficacy and safety. The platform developed can assist in guiding statin therapy decisions and optimizing treatment strategies. Further research and application of the model are warranted to improve the utilization of statin therapy.

Indexed as

efficacymachine learningpredictive modelrandom forestsafetystatins

Identifiers

PMID39135800
PMCPMC11317424

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.