ArticlePediatric health, medicine and therapeutics2024
Growth Status of Full-Term Infants with Different Sizes for Gestational Age During the First Year of Life.
Article in Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Feeding the hospitalized large-for-gestational-age infant: Clinical dilemmas and the need for growth standards.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to assess the growth of full-term infants with different sizes at birth and examine catch-up and catch-down growth in their first year. Methods: This retrospective population-based cohort study was based on the Guangdong Provincial Women and Children Health Information System. 194797 full-term singleton live births were extracted. Measurements for weight and length were taken at birth, 6 months, and 12 months. The size-for-gestational age was categorized as small (SGA, <10th centile), appropriate (AGA, 10th-90th centiles), or large (LGA, >90th centile) based on the international newborn size for gestational age and sex INTERGROWTH-21st standards. Catch-up and catch- down growth were defined as a change in standard deviation in z-score greater than 0.67 in the growth curves. Results: Of the 194797 full-term singletons, the average gestational age was 39.28 ± 1.03 weeks, and the average weight of the newborns was 3205 ± 383 grams. 15632 infants were identified as SGA (8.0%) and 12756 were LGA (6.5%). At 1 year of age, catch-up growth in weight was observed in 63.0% of SGA infants, 29.5% of AGA infants, and 5.4% of LGA infants. Conversely, catch-down growth occurred in 3.3% of SGA infants, 17.8% of AGA infants, and 54.7% of LGA infants. The proportions of catch-up growth in length for SGA, AGA, and LGA infants within the first year were 31.4%, 22.5%, and 17.1%, respectively. Catch-up or catch-down growth predominantly occurred before 6 months of age. However, from 6 to 12 months, there was no significant variation in WAZ among children with different birth sizes. Conclusion: In their first year of life, full-term singleton live births tend towards regression to the mean in their postnatal weight and length. The average delay in the growth of LGA is compensated by an increase in it of the SGA. Early monitoring and intervention are crucial for optimizing growth in infants with different birth sizes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.