Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39136716›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2025

[Medication supply and polypharmacy in long-term care : An overview of possible interventions and the question of a functioning concept].

Fabian Graeb, Bianca Berger, Frank Alf, Petra Reiber, Gundula Essig, Reinhold Wolke

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fabian GraebInstitut für Gesundheits- und Pflegewissenschaften, Hochschule Esslingen, Flandernstraße 101, 73732, Esslingen, Deutschland. Fabian.Graeb@hs-esslingen.de.
Bianca BergerInstitut für Gesundheits- und Pflegewissenschaften, Hochschule Esslingen, Flandernstraße 101, 73732, Esslingen, Deutschland.
Frank AlfInstitut für Gesundheits- und Pflegewissenschaften, Hochschule Esslingen, Flandernstraße 101, 73732, Esslingen, Deutschland.
Petra ReiberInstitut für Gesundheits- und Pflegewissenschaften, Hochschule Esslingen, Flandernstraße 101, 73732, Esslingen, Deutschland.
Gundula EssigInstitut für Gesundheits- und Pflegewissenschaften, Hochschule Esslingen, Flandernstraße 101, 73732, Esslingen, Deutschland.
Reinhold WolkeInstitut für Gesundheits- und Pflegewissenschaften, Hochschule Esslingen, Flandernstraße 101, 73732, Esslingen, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolypharmacy and the resulting problems lead to considerable consequences for those affected. There are also considerable problems with the medication management.

objectiveWhich interventions and programs for optimizing the supply of medication are available for nursing homes and which implementation problems can be expected? MATERIAL AND

methodA literature search was carried out for interventional studies in nursing homes in Germany, with a focus on improving medication safety.

resultsA total of six programs were identified for which evaluation results are available. Despite a mostly multimodal approach with several pillars of intervention (e.g., medication reviews, further education and training, development of aids), the results are largely disappointing. The effects on the number of prescriptions in general, specific medication groups or outcome parameters such as hospital admissions could only be shown in one study, whereby, selection bias could also be at least partly responsible for this. Interdisciplinary collaboration and the implementation of medication recommendations formulated in reviews by the responsible physicians are the main problem areas. At the same time, too little attention is paid to the central role of nurses in the entire process and they are not actively promoted enough. This could be one of the reasons for the difficulties in implementation in practice.

conclusionThere are nearly no significant changes as a result of the interventions implemented in the studies reviewed. In particular, interprofessional cooperation, especially the skills of nurses and the reluctance on the part of physicians, should probably be given more attention.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHomes for the AgedLong-Term CareNursing HomesPolypharmacyAgedAged, 80 and overGermanyHumansDrug-related problemsInterprofessional collaborationMedication managementPotentially inappropriate medicationResidential nursing homes

Identifiers

PMID39136716
PMCPMC12048413

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.