Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39138235›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Preventive machine learning models incorporating health checkup data and hair mineral analysis for low bone mass identification.

Su Jeong Kang, Joung Ouk Ryan Kim, Moon Jong Kim, Yang-Im Hur, Ji-Hee Haam, Kunhee Han, Young-Sang Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Su Jeong KangDepartment of Family Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, 13496, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0006-1052-2832
Joung Ouk Ryan KimDepartment of AI and Big Data, Swiss School of Management, 6500, Bellinzona, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1870-5469
Moon Jong KimDepartment of Family Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, 13496, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7961-4616
Yang-Im HurDepartment of Family Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, 13496, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2633-9980
Ji-Hee HaamDepartment of Family Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, 13496, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0004-3131-0156
Kunhee HanDepartment of Family Medicine, Seoul Medical Center, Seoul, 02053, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8307-7692
Young-Sang KimDepartment of Family Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, 13496, Republic of Korea. zeroup@cha.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0002-7397-5410

Funding

the Korean Fund for Regenerative Medicine (KFRM) grant KFRM 23C0102L1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) models have been increasingly employed to predict osteoporosis. However, the incorporation of hair minerals into ML models remains unexplored. This study aimed to develop ML models for predicting low bone mass (LBM) using health checkup data and hair mineral analysis. A total of 1206 postmenopausal women and 820 men aged 50 years or older at a health promotion center were included in this study. LBM was defined as a T-score below - 1 at the lumbar, femur neck, or total hip area. The proportion of individuals with LBM was 59.4% (n = 1205). The features used in the models comprised 50 health checkup items and 22 hair minerals. The ML algorithms employed were Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting (GB), and Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost). The subjects were divided into training and test datasets with an 80:20 ratio. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and an F1 score were evaluated to measure the performances of the models. Through 50 repetitions, the mean (standard deviation) AUROC for LBM was 0.744 (± 0.021) for XGB, the highest among the models, followed by 0.737 (± 0.023) for AdaBoost, and 0.733 (± 0.023) for GB, and 0.732 (± 0.021) for RF. The XGB model had an accuracy of 68.7%, sensitivity of 80.7%, specificity of 51.1%, PPV of 70.9%, NPV of 64.3%, and an F1 score of 0.754. However, these performance metrics did not demonstrate notable differences among the models. The XGB model identified sulfur, sodium, mercury, copper, magnesium, arsenic, and phosphate as crucial hair mineral features. The study findings emphasize the significance of employing ML algorithms for predicting LBM. Integrating health checkup data and hair mineral analysis into these models may provide valuable insights into identifying individuals at risk of LBM.

Indexed as

Bone DensityHairMachine LearningAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMineralsOsteoporosisROC CurveMineralsBone mineral densityExtreme gradient boostingHair mineral analysisMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID39138235
PMCPMC11322645

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.