Evidence mapPaperPMID 39138449Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Comparison of novel and traditional anthropometric indices in Eastern-China adults: which is the best indicator of the metabolically obese normal weight phenotype?

Yijia Chen, Chenchen Wang, Qiannan Sun, Qing Ye, Hairong Zhou, Zhenzhen Qin, Shengxiang Qi, Weiwei Wang, Xin Hong

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Relative Fat Mass and Psoriasis Risk: Evidence from NHANES 2009-2014.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yijia ChenDepartment of Non-Communicable Chronic Disease Prevention, Nanjing Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, 210003, China.
Chenchen WangDepartment of Non-Communicable Chronic Disease Prevention, Nanjing Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, 210003, China.
Qiannan SunDepartment of Non-Communicable Chronic Disease Prevention, Nanjing Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, 210003, China.
Qing YeDepartment of Non-Communicable Chronic Disease Prevention, Nanjing Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, 210003, China.
Hairong ZhouDepartment of Non-Communicable Chronic Disease Prevention, Nanjing Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, 210003, China.
Zhenzhen QinDepartment of Non-Communicable Chronic Disease Prevention, Nanjing Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, 210003, China.
Shengxiang QiDepartment of Non-Communicable Chronic Disease Prevention, Nanjing Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, 210003, China.
Weiwei WangDepartment of Non-Communicable Chronic Disease Prevention, Nanjing Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, 210003, China.
Xin HongDepartment of Non-Communicable Chronic Disease Prevention, Nanjing Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, 210003, China. nj_hongxin@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with the metabolically obese normal weight (MONW) phenotype have been confirmed to significantly increase the risk of unfavorable health consequences. This study aimed to investigate the relationships between traditional and novel anthropometric indices with the MONW phenotype and compare the predictive ability of different anthropometric indices in identifying individuals with the MONW phenotype.

methodsThis cross-sectional study involved a total of 26,332 participants aged 18 years or older with a normal weight from Nanjing, China. Sociodemographic information, biochemical measurements, and anthropometric indices were collected. The novel body fat anthropometric indices included body shape index (ABSI), body roundness index (BRI), abdominal volume index (AVI), weight-adjusted-waist index (WWI), body adiposity index (BAI), conicity index (CI), waist-hip-height ratio (WHHR), as well as traditional indices such as waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC), body mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR).The prevalence ratio (PR) from modified poisson regression and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) were conducted to compare the association and predictive capacity of different obesity indicators for the MONW phenotype. All analyses were stratified by sex.

resultsModified poisson regression analyses revealed that weight, WC, HC, BMI, WHR, WHtR, ABSI, BRI, AVI, WWI, BAI, CI, and WHHR were independently associated with higher risk of the MONW phenotype, regardless of whether they were treated as a continuous or categorical variable (P < 0.05). Notably, BRI demonstrated the strongest association in both men (highest quartile VS lowest quartile; PR = 3.14, 95%CI, 2.49, 3.96; P < 0.001) and women (PR = 4.63, 95%CI, 3.81, 5.62; P < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that AUC for the different anthropometric indices ranged from 0.50 to 0.80. BRI and WHtR had the largest AUC in both males (both AUC = 0.733; 95% CI, 0.717, 0.750) and females (both AUC = 0.773; 95% CI, 0.761, 0.786). The optimal cut-off points for BRI, determined by maximizing the Youden's index, were 3.102 (sensitivity: 63.2%, specificity: 36.2%) in males and 3.136 (sensitivity: 68.9%, specificity: 44.2%) in females. Moreover, BRI and WHtR exhibited the highest diagnostic accuracy in younger age groups, specifically those aged 18-34 in both sexes.

conclusionsBRI emerged as the optimal predictor and independent determinant of the MONW phenotype, regardless of gender. This association was particularly pronounced in young individuals.

Indexed as

AnthropometryPhenotypeAdolescentAdultAgedBody Mass IndexChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityYoung AdultAbdominal obesityAnthropometric indicesBody roundness indexMetabolically obese normal weight

Identifiers

PMID39138449
PMCPMC11321156

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.