ArticleBMC public health2024
Comparison of novel and traditional anthropometric indices in Eastern-China adults: which is the best indicator of the metabolically obese normal weight phenotype?
Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Obesity-Related Anthropometric Indicators and Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review.Archives of sexual behavior · 2025Pooled it
- Overweight/obesity and gait abnormality: what role does the brain play in the relationship?International journal of obesity (2005) · 2026Article
- Change of frailty index and anthropometric indices in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- METS-VF outperforms traditional adiposity indices in predicting overactive bladder risk: a NHANES-based cross-sectional study.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Comparison of the association and discriminatory ability of CVAI, LAP, CI, and AVI for type 2 diabetes in Chinese adults aged ≥ 50 years: a sex-specific analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Body roundness index and rheumatoid arthritis risk: Evidence from NHANES 1999 to 2020.Medicine · 2025Article
- The association between weight-adjusted waist index and physical fitness index among Chinese adolescents.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Association between body roundness index and trajectories of depressive symptoms among Chinese middle-aged and older adults: a nationwide cohort study from CHARLS.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Association of body roundness index with risk of all-cause, cardiovascular disease-cause, and cancer-cause mortality: the role of biological age acceleration.Nutrition journal · 2025Article
- Evaluating anthropometric indices of obesity for early osteoarthritis detection: focus on body fat percentage and relative fat mass.Clinical rheumatology · 2025Article
- Sex-specific association between body roundness index and cognitive impairment among hospitalized middle-aged and elderly patients with type 2 diabetes in China: a cross-sectional analysis.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Associations of the body roundness index with cognitive function in US older adults and the mediating role of depression: a cross-sectional study from the NHANES 2011-2014.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Association between weight-adjusted waist index and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.PloS one · 2025Article
- Body roundness index and the risk of knee osteoarthritis: evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Relative Fat Mass and Psoriasis Risk: Evidence from NHANES 2009-2014.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Article
- Ranges, temporal trend, and determinants of novel obesity indices in middle-aged and older Chinese population: insights from a nationally representative and longitudinal study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Weight-Adjusted Waist Index, Psoriasis, and All-Cause Mortality: Findings from the NHANES 2003-2006 and 2009-2014.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeople with the metabolically obese normal weight (MONW) phenotype have been confirmed to significantly increase the risk of unfavorable health consequences. This study aimed to investigate the relationships between traditional and novel anthropometric indices with the MONW phenotype and compare the predictive ability of different anthropometric indices in identifying individuals with the MONW phenotype.
methodsThis cross-sectional study involved a total of 26,332 participants aged 18 years or older with a normal weight from Nanjing, China. Sociodemographic information, biochemical measurements, and anthropometric indices were collected. The novel body fat anthropometric indices included body shape index (ABSI), body roundness index (BRI), abdominal volume index (AVI), weight-adjusted-waist index (WWI), body adiposity index (BAI), conicity index (CI), waist-hip-height ratio (WHHR), as well as traditional indices such as waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC), body mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR).The prevalence ratio (PR) from modified poisson regression and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) were conducted to compare the association and predictive capacity of different obesity indicators for the MONW phenotype. All analyses were stratified by sex.
resultsModified poisson regression analyses revealed that weight, WC, HC, BMI, WHR, WHtR, ABSI, BRI, AVI, WWI, BAI, CI, and WHHR were independently associated with higher risk of the MONW phenotype, regardless of whether they were treated as a continuous or categorical variable (P < 0.05). Notably, BRI demonstrated the strongest association in both men (highest quartile VS lowest quartile; PR = 3.14, 95%CI, 2.49, 3.96; P < 0.001) and women (PR = 4.63, 95%CI, 3.81, 5.62; P < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that AUC for the different anthropometric indices ranged from 0.50 to 0.80. BRI and WHtR had the largest AUC in both males (both AUC = 0.733; 95% CI, 0.717, 0.750) and females (both AUC = 0.773; 95% CI, 0.761, 0.786). The optimal cut-off points for BRI, determined by maximizing the Youden's index, were 3.102 (sensitivity: 63.2%, specificity: 36.2%) in males and 3.136 (sensitivity: 68.9%, specificity: 44.2%) in females. Moreover, BRI and WHtR exhibited the highest diagnostic accuracy in younger age groups, specifically those aged 18-34 in both sexes.
conclusionsBRI emerged as the optimal predictor and independent determinant of the MONW phenotype, regardless of gender. This association was particularly pronounced in young individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.