Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39138524›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2024

An optimised CRISPR Cas9 and Cas12a mutagenesis toolkit for Barley and Wheat.

Tom Lawrenson, Martha Clarke, Rachel Kirby, Macarena Forner, Burkhard Steuernagel, James K M Brown, Wendy Harwood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Wheat's Up with CRISPR-Cas-Current Advances, Obstacles and Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tom LawrensonJohn Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UH, UK. tom.lawrenson@jic.ac.uk.
Martha ClarkeJohn Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UH, UK.
Rachel KirbyJohn Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UH, UK.
Macarena FornerJohn Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UH, UK.
Burkhard SteuernagelJohn Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UH, UK.
James K M BrownJohn Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UH, UK.
Wendy HarwoodJohn Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UH, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P013511/1The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) ENSA project
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCRISPR Cas9 and Cas12a are the two most frequently used programmable nucleases reported in plant systems. There is now a wide range of component parts for both which likely have varying degrees of effectiveness and potentially applicability to different species. Our aim was to develop and optimise Cas9 and Cas12a based systems for highly efficient genome editing in the monocotyledons barley and wheat and produce a user-friendly toolbox facilitating simplex and multiplex editing in the cereal community.

resultsWe identified a Zea mays codon optimised Cas9 with 13 introns in conjunction with arrayed guides driven by U6 and U3 promoters as the best performer in barley where 100% of T0 plants were simultaneously edited in all three target genes. When this system was used in wheat > 90% of T0 plants were edited in all three subgenome targets. For Cas12a, an Arabidopsis codon optimised sequence with 8 introns gave the best editing efficiency in barley when combined with a tRNA based multiguide array, resulting in 90% mutant alleles in three simultaneously targeted genes. When we applied this Cas12a system in wheat 86% & 93% of T0 plants were mutated in two genes simultaneously targeted. We show that not all introns contribute equally to enhanced mutagenesis when inserted into a Cas12a coding sequence and that there is rationale for including multiple introns. We also show that the combined effect of two features which boost Cas12a mutagenesis efficiency (D156R mutation and introns) is more than the sum of the features applied separately.

conclusionBased on the results of our testing, we describe and provide a GoldenGate modular cloning system for Cas9 and Cas12a use in barley and wheat. Proven Cas nuclease and guide expression cassette options found in the toolkit will facilitate highly efficient simplex and multiplex mutagenesis in both species. We incorporate GRF-GIF transformation boosting cassettes in wheat options to maximise workflow efficiency.

Indexed as

CerealGenome editingGolden GateIntron-mediated enhancementTargeted mutagenesis

Identifiers

PMID39138524
PMCPMC11321142

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.