ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024
An epilepsy classification based on FFT and fully convolutional neural network nested LSTM.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- CosFNet: A Lightweight Epileptic EEG Detection Model Based on Cosine Convolution and FNet.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multiscale Cosine Convolution Neural Network for Robust and Interpretable Epileptic EEG Detection.Biosensors · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Epilepsy, which is associated with neuronal damage and functional decline, typically presents patients with numerous challenges in their daily lives. An early diagnosis plays a crucial role in managing the condition and alleviating the patients' suffering. Electroencephalogram (EEG)-based approaches are commonly employed for diagnosing epilepsy due to their effectiveness and non-invasiveness. In this study, a classification method is proposed that use fast Fourier Transform (FFT) extraction in conjunction with convolutional neural networks (CNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) models. Methods: Most methods use traditional frameworks to classify epilepsy, we propose a new approach to this problem by extracting features from the source data and then feeding them into a network for training and recognition. It preprocesses the source data into training and validation data and then uses CNN and LSTM to classify the style of the data. Results: Upon analyzing a public test dataset, the top-performing features in the fully CNN nested LSTM model for epilepsy classification are FFT features among three types of features. Notably, all conducted experiments yielded high accuracy rates, with values exceeding 96% for accuracy, 93% for sensitivity, and 96% for specificity. These results are further benchmarked against current methodologies, showcasing consistent and robust performance across all trials. Our approach consistently achieves an accuracy rate surpassing 97.00%, with values ranging from 97.95 to 99.83% in individual experiments. Particularly noteworthy is the superior accuracy of our method in the AB versus (vs.) CDE comparison, registering at 99.06%. Conclusion: Our method exhibits precise classification abilities distinguishing between epileptic and non-epileptic individuals, irrespective of whether the participant's eyes are closed or open. Furthermore, our technique shows remarkable performance in effectively categorizing epilepsy type, distinguishing between epileptic ictal and interictal states versus non-epileptic conditions. An inherent advantage of our automated classification approach is its capability to disregard EEG data acquired during states of eye closure or eye-opening. Such innovation holds promise for real-world applications, potentially aiding medical professionals in diagnosing epilepsy more efficiently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.