Evidence mapPaperPMID 39140239Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2024

Sociodigital Determinants of eHealth Literacy and Related Impact on Health Outcomes and eHealth Use in Korean Older Adults: Community-Based Cross-Sectional Survey.

Myat Yadana Kyaw, Myo Nyein Aung, Yuka Koyanagi, Saiyud Moolphate, Thin Nyein Nyein Aung, Hok Ka Carol Ma, Hocheol Lee, Hae-Kweun Nam, Eun Woo Nam, Motoyuki Yuasa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Low income and health literacy: a systematic scoping review.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Myat Yadana KyawDepartment of Global Health Research, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Hongo-2-1-1 , Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan, 81 338133111 ext 2994, 81 338181168.ORCID 0000-0003-3779-2091
Myo Nyein AungDepartment of Global Health Research, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Hongo-2-1-1 , Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan, 81 338133111 ext 2994, 81 338181168.ORCID 0000-0001-8175-6309
Yuka KoyanagiDepartment of Global Health Research, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Hongo-2-1-1 , Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan, 81 338133111 ext 2994, 81 338181168.ORCID 0000-0002-5455-926X
Saiyud MoolphateDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Science and Technology, Chiang Mai Rajabhat University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-5712-5996
Thin Nyein Nyein AungDepartment of Global Health Research, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Hongo-2-1-1 , Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan, 81 338133111 ext 2994, 81 338181168.ORCID 0000-0002-8030-8026
Hok Ka Carol MaS R Nathan School of Human Development, Singapore University of Social Sciences, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-9420-0112
Hocheol LeeDepartment of Health Administration, Yonsei University Graduate School, Wonju, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1467-8843
Hae-Kweun NamDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine Yonsei University, Wonju, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3353-6990
Eun Woo NamDepartment of Health Administration, Software Digital Healthcare Convergence College, Yonsei University, Wonju, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3517-6247
Motoyuki YuasaDepartment of Global Health Research, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Hongo-2-1-1 , Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan, 81 338133111 ext 2994, 81 338181168.ORCID 0000-0003-2132-7275

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: eHealth literacy is an essential skill for pursuing electronic health information, particularly for older people whose health needs increase with age. South Korea is now at the intersection of a rapidly digitalizing society and an increasingly aged population. eHealth literacy enables older people to maximize the effective use of emerging digital technology for their health and quality of life. Understanding the eHealth literacy of Korean older adults is critical to eliminating the gray digital divide and inequity in health information access. Objective: This study aims to investigate factors influencing eHealth literacy in older Korean adults and its impact on health outcomes and eHealth use. Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey. Community-dwelling older adults 65 years and older in 2 urban cities in South Korea were included. eHealth literacy was measured by the eHealth Literacy Scale. Ordinal logistic regression was used to analyze factors associated with eHealth literacy and multivariate ANOVA for the impact of eHealth literacy on health outcomes and eHealth use. Results: In total, 434 participants were analyzed. A total of 22.3% (97/434) of participants had high eHealth literacy skills. Increasing age, higher monthly income, and time spent on the internet were significantly associated with eHealth literacy (P<.001), and social media users were 3.97 times (adjusted odds ratio 3.97, 95% CI 1.02-15.43; P=.04) more likely to have higher skill. Higher eHealth literacy was associated with better self-perceived health and frequent use of digital technologies for accessing health and care services (P<.001). Conclusions: Disparity in socioeconomic status and engagement on the internet and social media can result in different levels of eHealth literacy skills, which can have consequential impacts on health outcomes and eHealth use. Tailored eHealth interventions, grounded on the social and digital determinants of eHealth literacy, could facilitate eHealth information access among older adults and foster a digitally inclusive healthy aging community.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyTelemedicineAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndependent LivingMaleRepublic of KoreaSurveys and Questionnairesagingdigital healthdigital interventiondigital interventionsdigital technologyeHEALSeHealth educationeHealth informationeHealth literacyeHealth Literacy ScaleeHealth trainingelectronic health informationgeriatricgeriatricsgerontologygray digital dividehealth educationhealth literacyhealth traininghealthy agingolder adultolder adultsolder peopleolder person

Identifiers

PMID39140239
PMCPMC11336493

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.