Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39143122›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Segmentation of ovarian cyst in ultrasound images using AdaResU-net with optimization algorithm and deep learning model.

Mohemmed Sha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mohemmed ShaDepartment of Software Engineering, College of Computer Engineering and Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, 16278, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia. ms.mohamed@psau.edu.sa.

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University PSAU/2024/R/1445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian cysts pose significant health risks including torsion, infertility, and cancer, necessitating rapid and accurate diagnosis. Ultrasonography is commonly employed for screening, yet its effectiveness is hindered by challenges like weak contrast, speckle noise, and hazy boundaries in images. This study proposes an adaptive deep learning-based segmentation technique using a database of ovarian ultrasound cyst images. A Guided Trilateral Filter (GTF) is applied for noise reduction in pre-processing. Segmentation utilizes an Adaptive Convolutional Neural Network (AdaResU-net) for precise cyst size identification and benign/malignant classification, optimized via the Wild Horse Optimization (WHO) algorithm. Objective functions Dice Loss Coefficient and Weighted Cross-Entropy are optimized to enhance segmentation accuracy. Classification of cyst types is performed using a Pyramidal Dilated Convolutional (PDC) network. The method achieves a segmentation accuracy of 98.87%, surpassing existing techniques, thereby promising improved diagnostic accuracy and patient care outcomes.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDeep LearningOvarian CystsUltrasonographyFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerAdaResU-Net modelClassificationDeep learning modelGuided trilateral filterOvarian cystSegmentationUltrasound detectionWild horse optimizer

Identifiers

PMID39143122
PMCPMC11325020

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.