ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin open2022
A Possible White Matter Compensating Mechanism in the Brain of Relatives of People Affected by Psychosis Inferred from Repeated Long-Term DTI Scans.
Article in Schizophrenia bulletin open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- White matter microstructure changes across the lifespan: a meta-analysis of longitudinal diffusion MRI studies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Clusters of psychosis: compensation as a contributor to the heterogeneity of schizophrenia.Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPNArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Hypothesis: An existing model suggests that some brain features of relatives of people affected by psychosis can be distinguished from both the probands and a control group. Such findings can be interpreted as representing a compensating mechanism. Study Design: We studied white matter features using diffusion tensor imaging in a cohort of 82 people affected by psychosis, 122 of their first-degree relatives, and 89 control subjects that were scanned between two to three times with an interval of approximately 3 years between consecutive scans. We measured both fractional anisotropy and other standard diffusivity measures such as axial diffusivity. Additionally, we calculated standard connectivity measures such as path length based on probabilistic or deterministic tractography. Finally, by averaging the values of the different measures over the two or three consecutive scans, we studied epoch-averagely the difference between these three groups. Study Results: For several tracts and several connectivity measures, the relatives showed distinct features from both the probands and the control groups. In those cases, the relatives did not necessarily score between the probands and the control group. An aggregate analysis in the form of a group-dependent score for the different modes of the analysis (e.g., for fractional anisotropy) supported this observation. Conclusions: We interpret these results as evidence supporting a compensation mechanism in the brain of relatives that may be related to resilience that some of them exhibit in the face of the genetic risk they have for being affected by psychosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.